Introduction to calculus and differental and integral calculus - courant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between Courant's two calculus textbooks: "Differential and Integral Calculus" and the newer "Introduction to Calculus and Analysis." The latter is a modern rewrite aimed at addressing the evolving needs of college and university students in the United States. The preface of "Introduction to Calculus and Analysis" highlights its intention to supplement the original work rather than simply remodel it. This new book emphasizes intuitive understanding and the practical applications of calculus, avoiding a dogmatic approach. It aims to foster intellectual independence among students by showcasing the connections between mathematical analysis and real-world applications, while still maintaining a level of precision. The book targets a diverse audience, including mathematicians, scientists, and engineers, and seeks to illuminate the subject's complexities without oversimplifying it.
hellbike
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
What's difference between those Courant's books? They both seems to be first year calc books.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Introduction to Calculus and Analysis is a newer, more modern rewrite of Differential and Integral Calculus.

Here is an excerpt from the preface of Introduction to Calculus and Analysis (volume 1) which talks (sort of vaguely) about the two versions:

"During the years it became apparent that the need of college and university instruction in the United States made a rewriting of [Differential and Integral Calculus] desirable. Yet, it seemed unwise to tamper with the original versions which have remained and still are viable.

Instead of trying to remodel the existing work it seemed preferable to supplement it by an essentially new book in many ways related to the European originals but more specifically directed at the needs of the present and future students in the United States. Such a plan became feasible when Fritz John, who had already greatly helped in the preparation of the first English edition, agreed to write the new book together with R. Courant.

While it differs markedly in form and content from the original, it is animated by the same intention: To lead the student directly to the heart of the subject and to prepare him for active application of his knowledge. It avoids the dogmatic style which conceals the motivation and the roots of the calculus in intuitive reality. To exhibit the interaction between mathematical analysis and its various applications and to emphasize the role of intuition remains an important aim of this new book. Somewhat strengthened precision does not, as we hope, interfere with this aim.

Mathematics presented as a closed, linearly ordered, system of truths without reference to origin and purpose has its charm and satisfies a philosophical need. But the attitude of introverted science is unsuitable for students who seek intellectual independence rather than indoctrination; disregard for applications and intuition leads to isolation and atrophy of mathematics. It seems extremely important that students and instructors should be protected from smug purism.

The book is addressed to students on various levels, to mathematicians, scientists, engineers. It does not pretend to make the subject easy by glossing over difficulties, but rather tries to help the genuinely interested reader by throwing light on the interconnections and purposes of the whole."
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Back
Top