Introductory Stoichiometry Question

AI Thread Summary
To solve the stoichiometry problem, first, the balanced equation for the reaction between KOH and sulfuric acid is established. The moles of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) are calculated to be 0.0023 moles using its concentration and volume. The moles of KOH are determined to be 0.0356 moles from the mass and molar mass. To find the molarity of the KOH solution, divide the moles of KOH by the volume of the solution in liters, which equals 0.1424 mol/L. Finally, to find the volume of KOH solution needed to neutralize the sulfuric acid, use the molarity and the moles of KOH required, leading to the conclusion that approximately 16.1 mL of the KOH solution is necessary.
TankNation
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A solution of KOH is prepared by dissolving 2.00g of KOH in water to a final volume of 250mL of solution. What volume of this solution will neutralize 20.0mL of 0.115 mol/L sulfuric acid?


Homework Equations


C=n/v
C1V1=C2V2
n=m/M

Attempt at solution

First I balanced the equation:
2KOH+H2SO4->k2S04+2H20

Than I figured out the moles of H2S04:
v=0.02L
C=0.115mol/L
n=c*V=2.3x10^-3 mols.

Than I found the mols of KOH
m=2g
M=56.1g/mol
n=m/M.
n=0.0356 mols

The problem is after this step I get confused as to what to do with the 250mL. Can someone give me an explanation please on how and why? (if you help me solve it)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is molarity of the KOH solution? What volume of this solution contains 0.0356 moles of KOH?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top