Intuition behind a method of adding two fractions

Juwane
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
One way to add two fractions is to multiply the numerators of both fractions with each other's denominator, then adding the two products, gives us the numerator of the final result. Then we multiply together the denominators of each other--this gives us the denominator of the final result.

Consider this example:

<br /> \frac{2}{3} + \frac{4}{5} = \frac{(5\times2)+(3\times4)}{(3\times5)} = \frac{22}{15}<br />

Why are we able to do that? I'm not looking for a rigorous proof, just the intuition behind it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To add fractions, they need the same denominator. We "change" the fractions to have a common denominator by the identity property x·1 = x and then simplify the result.
\frac{2}{3} + \frac{4}{5} = \frac{2}{3}\times\frac{5}{5} + \frac{4}{5}\times\frac{3}{3}

= \frac{2\times 5}{3\times 5} + \frac{4\times 3}{5\times 3} = \frac{(5\times 2) + (3\times 4)}{3\times 5}

I suppose the "intuition" is to make the denominators the same and then combine the fractions. What you have could be used as a formula for adding fractions, bypassing all the steps that lead up to that result.
 
This reminds me of something I told one of my friends a long time ago while driving down the highway. We saw a sign saying 3/4 mile to our exit. I mentioned to her, "there's only three quarter-miles to go." She thought about it for a second and was amused that she never thought of it as three "quarter miles." In her mind, it was always "three quarters" of a whole mile.

The nice thing is the two are interchangeable. Any hungry child will tell you that half a pie isn't the same as a third of a pie. But which is bigger? How do you compare halves and thirds? You convert each to an equal amount of sixths-pies. Then it's clear. If you cut a pie into 6 even pieces, you need to take 3 to have taken half the pie, so 1/2 = 3/6. And in the same way, you need 2/6 of a pie to equal that third-pie.

It's obvious with pie and pictures. But once you distill it to numbers, it does appear mysterious.
 
One way of thinking about it is that the denominators of fractions are really "units". That is, if we talk about "4 feet" or "3 yards", the "4" and "3" alone would be meaningless without specifying what units we are using. If we were to add those, we would NOT get "7" anything! We must have the same units. Here, it is simplest to change "3 yards" to 9 feet, since there are 3 yards to a foot. "4 feet plus 3 yards" is the same as "4 feet plus 9 feet= (4 + 9) feet= 13 feet.

Similarly, two add 2/3 plus 4/5, I need to get the same "units". One "third" is not any integer multiple of one "fifth" or vice versa but one "third" is 5 "fifteenths" so 2 "thirds" is 10 "fifteenths" and one "fifth" is 3 "fifteenths" so 4 "fifths" is 12 "fifteenths".

2 thirds plus 4 fifths= 10 fifteenths plust 12 fifteenths= 22 fifteenths.
2/3+ 4/5= 10/15+ 12/15= 22/15.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top