Inverse Laplace Transform - Step Function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse Laplace Transform of a given expression involving a step function and a rational function. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin the problem and considers rewriting the expression, particularly focusing on the exponential term and the quadratic in the denominator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using properties of the Laplace transform to simplify the expression, including removing the exponential term and applying partial fractions. There is also a suggestion to complete the square on the quadratic denominator.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, including specific algebraic manipulations. The original poster has shared their progress and expressed confusion about certain terms, indicating an ongoing exploration of the topic without a clear consensus on the next steps.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions this is their second time using TeX, indicating a learning curve in presenting their work. There is also a focus on ensuring clarity in mathematical expressions during the discussion.

jmg498
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Given...

(2s^{2}+1)e^{-s}
------------------
(s - 1)(s^{2} + 4s + 5)

Find the inverse Laplace Transform.

I am unsure where to start and am just looking for a little direction, not an answer. From past experience, I am assuming I will have to rewrite this in another form...perhaps by taking out the e^{-s} term. I also believe I will need to complete the square on the quadratic in the denominator.

If someone could just point me in the right direction, that would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, use the properties of the Laplace transform to get rid of the e^{-s}. Then use partial fractions to do the rest.
 
Ok, so I did that...here's my work...(note, I factored out the 1/10 that appears in both terms).

(e^{-s}/10)\frac{17s+5}{(s+2)^{2}+4s+5}+\frac{3}{s-1}

Then I completed the square on the quadratic in the denominator and rewrote it...

(e^{-s}/10)\frac{17s+5}{(s+2)^{2}+1}+\frac{3}{s-1}

Now, finding the inverse Laplace Transform of 3/(s-1) is very simple. So is finding the inverse transform of e^{-s}. But the term containing the 17s + 5 is confusing me.
 
Try writing

\frac{17s}{(s+2)^2+1} + \frac{5}{(s+2)^2+1}

Also, your formulas will be easier to read if you write the entire thing in TeX instead of just bits and pieces.
 
And you should be able to get rid of the e^{-s} part by using this property:

\mathcal{L}\{f(t-a)\} = e^{-as}F(s)
 
Thanks very much! This is only my second time using TeX so I apologize for that. Getting used to it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K