Inverse of an operator does not exist, can't see why

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elwin.Martin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Operator
Elwin.Martin
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
I feel kind of lame, but here's my situation:
We start with the operator g_{\mu \nu} \Box - \partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu} and convert to momentum space to get -g_{\mu \nu} k^{2} - k_{\mu}k_{\nu}.

Apparently it's easy to see that this has no inverse?

I'm told that if it *did* it would be of the form
Ag^{\nu \lambda} +B k^{\nu}k^{\lambda}
but I don't see why it would be in this form, to start with. Are these A's and B's just constant coefficients...?

I understand that given the form above, we can simply multiply our inverse and original operator and we get that -Ak^{2}\delta_{\mu}^{\lambda} +A k_{\mu}k^{\lambda}=\delta_{\mu}^{\lambda}
. . . but I don't see why this is an issue, or rather, I can't see why this equation has no solution.

Thanks for any and all help,
E_Martin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mentz114 said:
I don't think these equations have a solution

<br /> -Ak^{2}\delta_{\mu}^{\lambda} +A k_{\mu}k^{\lambda}=\delta_{\mu}^{\lambda}<br />

but I can't prove it right now.

:P then you're in agreement with Ryder...I don't see it though. I have the feeling it doesn't, but I cannot show it.
 
Elwin.Martin said:
:P then you're in agreement with Ryder...I don't see it though. I have the feeling it doesn't, but I cannot show it.

Sorry, I deleted my post because I'm looking for a solution and it might be on.

Have you found a solution ?
[Edit] Any solution leads to a contradiction, so there isn't one. Try writing out all 16 equations.
 
Last edited:
Mentz114 said:
Sorry, I deleted my post because I'm looking for a solution and it might be on.

Have you found a solution ?
[Edit] Any solution leads to a contradiction, so there isn't one. Try writing out all 16 equations.

OH, WOW...thanks!

Just writing out the first component works, haha...fail.

Thanks again!
 
Non-trivial projection operator has no inverse; P^{2}=P. Consider
P_{ab} = g_{ab} - \frac{k_{a}k_{b}}{k^{2}},
P^{ac}= g^{ac} - \frac{k^{a}k^{c}}{k^{2}}.
then
P_{ab}P^{ac} = \delta^{c}_{b} - \frac{k_{b}k^{c}}{k^{2}} \equiv P^{c}_{b}
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top