Inverse Power Law: Solve for Power at 400m

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying the inverse power law to calculate power at different distances, specifically from 100m to 400m, using a modified exponent of 2.5. The initial calculation suggests that power decreases from 5W at 100m to approximately 0.15625W at 400m. However, confusion arises between the traditional inverse square law, which typically uses an exponent of 2, and the proposed 2.5 power law, which is more applicable in certain environments like urban settings where obstacles affect signal propagation. Participants express concern about the validity of using a 2.5 exponent for radiant power loss, questioning whether such a decrease is physically plausible. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the context and correct application of power laws in real-world scenarios.
mrdman
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
If the power at 100m is 5W, using inverse 2.5 power law, find the power at 400m.
Relevant Equations
1 / d ^ x
Hi everyone! Awesome forum!
I'm doubting myself on a problem about inverse square law.
I'll change the actual values from my homework problem as I want to check that I have the right idea rather than the specific numeric answer.

If I am using an inverse 2.5 power law and know the power at 100m is 5W.. If I want to find out the power at 400m, is the following correct...?

100m: 5W
200m: 5 * 1/2 ^ 2.5
300m: 5 * 1/3 ^ 2.5
400m: 5 * 1/4 ^ 2.5

So the answer will be: 5 * (0.25)^2.5
Which is 5 * 0.03125 = 0.15625W

I've had three attempts so far and keep getting varying answers each time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me.
 
  • Like
Likes mrdman
Awesome! Many thanks.
 
mrdman said:
Homework Statement: If the power at 100m is 5W, using inverse 2.5 power law, find the power at 400m.
Homework Equations: 1 / d ^ x

If I am using an inverse 2.5 power law
Sorry for my dumb question, but this seems a bit confusing to me. There are two kinds of "power" that seem to be getting mixed in this question.

There is the decrease in radiant power from a source, which varies as the inverse of the distance squared (not to the power 2.5).

And there is the "power law" which refers to when a quantity varies with a constant exponent relationship:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_law
1566568375054.png


The constant exponent does not have to be "2" in general, and varies depending on the phenomena being described by the equation.

To me, it is very confusing to mix both concepts together in this question. It implies that somehow radiant power can drop off by the exponent 2.5 instead of 2. In the far field at least, I don't think that can happen. Can it?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Hi.. I'm not 100% sure but it may help if I explained the context in which I am doing this calculation.
It is regarding power loss from a cell tower in a city environment. In this environment inverse square law doesn't work out in practice (city obstacles etc) so we were told to use 3.5 power law (I may be getting my terms mixed up. Is it called 3.5 power law?) Above in my example I changed it to 2.5 and changed all the values so I didn't get help with the specific answer, but rather the concept of how to solve it.

Hope that helps and I've not mixed up terms too much.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top