Inverse Trig Function Derivative (Apostol Section 6.22 #11)

process91
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given that \frac{d}{dx} (\text{arccot}{x}-\arctan{1/x})=0 \hspace{10mm} \forall x \ne 0,
prove that there is no constant C such that \text{arccot}{x}-\arctan{\frac{1}{x}}=C \hspace{10mm} \forall x \ne 0
and explain why this does not contradict the zero-derivative theorem.


Homework Equations


The Zero-Derivative Theorem:
If f'(x) = 0 for each x in an open interval I, then f is constant on I.


The Attempt at a Solution


The first part of this problem has you verify that the derivative is indeed zero, which I did verify. I think that \text{arccot}{x}-\arctan{\frac{1}{x}}=0 \hspace{10mm} \forall x \ne 0, however, since \text{arccot}{x}=y \implies x=\cot{y} \implies \frac{1}{x} = \tan{y} \implies \arctan{\frac{1}{x}}=y.

WolframAlpha seems to agree:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=arccot(x)+-+arctan(1/x)

So is Apostol not considering 0 a constant (that is, when he refers to "a constant C", is C necessarily not equal to 0)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, so the reason my "proof" that it is equal to zero doesn't work is in the last step, where \arctan{\frac{1}{x}} may equal y (if y\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2})), or it may equal y-\pi, correct?

Then the reason that this is not a contradiction of the zero derivative theorem is that at x=0 there is a discontinuity, and on either side of 0 it would apply but the constants are not equal.
 
Indeed!
 
Thanks for your help! I'm loving Apostol's book so far.
 
process91 said:
Thanks for your help! I'm loving Apostol's book so far.

It's one of my favorite books as well :biggrin:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top