Investigating Weight Distribution & Acceleration in Toy Cars

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a science experiment involving battery-powered toy cars to investigate the impact of weight distribution on acceleration. The experiment compares two cars, one with added weight at the front (Car F) and the other at the back (Car B), with results showing that Car B accelerates faster. The explanation suggests that the quicker weight transfer to the rear allows for better traction, enhancing acceleration. Participants highlight that the cars may not be perfect four-wheel drive, which could affect torque distribution. The suggestion to swap weights between the cars is made to further validate the findings.
carcar2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am doing a science experiment dealing with car physics.

The experiment I am doing involves battery-powered toy cars approximately the size of a hand (four-wheel drive). I am not sure
what effect the weight distribution has on the acceleration of the car. To be more specific, I am looking for the effect of weight/downforce applied to either the front or the back on weight
transfer/traction.

I am attaching weight to the front for one kind of a car(Car F) and the back for another(Car B) and testing the time of the two in a straight-line race. According to my data, the car with the weight attached to the back(Car B) is faster. The only explanation I can come up is that the time which it takes for the weight transfer to take place for the car with weight attached to the back(Car B) is less than the other car(Car F), which makes Car B to accelerate faster. Would you explain why the difference took place?

Also, I am not sure if the traction caused by downforce in the front or the back has any different effect on the speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi carcar, welcome to the forums.

Is it possible that the cars aren't perfect four wheel drive? Maybe more torque is going to the rear wheels. That would explain the difference.
 
As a car nut (a real one, not toys :p), I could have told you, that all things being equal, the car with the weight on the back will accelerate faster.

Rear engined dragsters are the top runners for a reason :)

Weight transfer, as well as traction come into play. Assuming you are getting consistant answers, I would say that your experiment went as planned.
Traction doesn't come into play as "downforce" because frankly these cars aren't moving fast enough. This does matter in the 'launch' (the initial take off), as the weight on the rear will be greater due to transfer, and thus the more weight on the rear means more traction on the tires that will be contacting the most. This is how it works in the real world, but I do believe that wheel spin on your toy car, even if it weren't 4x4, would be negligible, but who knows :p


Swap weights on the cars, and see if you get the same results.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top