Ion Specific Molar Conductivity And Resistance

leviathanX777
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
1. Hi, basically I'm trying to find an equation to find ion specific molar conductivity of salt water flowing between electrodes.

Homework Equations



resistivity: rho = RA/L
conductivity: kappa = 1/rho
conducitivity per unit concentration: lambda = conductivity/concentration

this is ion specific molar conducitivity with units of (s.m^2)/mol

Dunno if this is correct

Also to find the resistance of the ions using conductivity per unit concentration:

gamma = L/lambda A

Where A and L are the area of the electrodes and length respectively. Is this correct or am I totally wrong?

Do ions have resistance associated with them according to their movement?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equations you have mentioned are correct. Ion specific molar conductivity (lambda) is the conductivity per unit concentration, so it has units of (s.m^2)/mol. To find the resistance of the ions using conductivity per unit concentration, you can use the equation gamma = L/lambda A, where A and L are the area of the electrodes and length respectively.Ions do have resistance associated with them according to their movement. This resistance is caused by the interaction between the ions and the solvent molecules, as well as the ion-ion interactions. This resistance is known as ionic resistance and can be calculated using the Nernst-Einstein equation.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top