Ions Table: Find the Perfect Resource for Your Chemistry Needs

  • Thread starter Thread starter PPonte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ions Table
AI Thread Summary
A user initially sought a comprehensive ions table for chemistry but later found one. The discussion shifted to clarifying whether the request was for cations, anions, or both, including complex ions. Several links to useful resources were shared, providing various ions tables. The user specified interest only in anions and cations, excluding complex ions. The conversation highlights the importance of clear specifications when searching for chemistry resources.
PPonte
Anyone has a nice, neat and complete ions table? I haven't found one yet.

----

Edit: Sorry, I have just found one. But if someone has a good sugestion do not hesitate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
I was just interested in anions and cations not in complex ions. Thank you.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top