Iref extraction in active power filters using active filters

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the extraction of the Iref waveform in active power filters, highlighting the complexity of current algorithms like FFT and DFT used in frequency and time domains. There is curiosity about the potential for using op-amp active filters, such as notch filters, to isolate the fundamental frequency for Iref extraction. The conversation notes that many existing filters do not account for Iref, and emphasizes the importance of understanding harmonic signatures when sizing filters, especially for systems like 6 pulse rectifiers. While analog solutions are possible, they are often more costly and difficult to configure compared to digital approaches, which have become the standard due to their efficiency and lower costs. The transition from analog to digital in power systems is illustrated by a case study involving a large inverter system that faced challenges with waveform data collection in its original analog setup.
Axe199
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
i was doing a research on active power filters and i read about Iref ( the cancelation waveform) extraction algorithm, and they are using complicated algorithms like FFT or DFT in frequency domain or the park transform and clark transform in time domain, i was wondering, why isn't there any technique using opamp active filters to extract the Iref? maybe a notch filter attenuating only the fundamental frequency?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I expect that every approach to filtering ever imagined has been tried. There are also many filters designed without any consideration of Iref. That's just one way to describe it.
 
anorlunda said:
There are also many filters designed without any consideration of Iref. That's just one way to describe it.
are those active power filters?
 
Since you frequently have a DSP there just to manage PWM for the filter, you want to digitize and analyze the current waveform in a way the processor can manage it, so you typically have this tool at your disposal. Also - the primary metric for power quality is often the THD - and looked at in the frequency domain - so you are correcting the same thing you are measuring.

Then when sizing the filter - you want to know what the primary causes are; e.g. a 6 pulse rectifier has a particular harmonic signature, and when choosing the filter you take that into consideration.

It is possible to do this all in analog, but today that is more expensive and much harder to configure. I have a client that had a 2MW inverter for solar, wind and energy storage - the original design was analog, and they only designed this out and went to digital about 4 years ago. ( Analog controller ~$1500, digital $90 ). When they had a problem, I had asked for some waveform data - impossible to add that feature in their analog set up without adding hardware.
 
  • Like
Likes Axe199
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
25K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
773
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K