Iron Ore Extraction: Positive Environmental Impacts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Extraction Iron
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the environmental impacts of iron ore extraction, with participants struggling to identify any positive effects. Most agree that the extraction process is largely detrimental, causing environmental disturbances and waste management issues. While metals are essential for various consumer products and infrastructure, their extraction is viewed as harmful to ecosystems. The economic implications of iron ore extraction are also debated, highlighting the vulnerability of economies reliant on this resource due to fluctuating global demand. Overall, the consensus leans towards the negative environmental and economic impacts of iron ore extraction.
Aya
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I really don't know what catagoir this would go under :confused: , but its an assignment for chem so...

Woud there be any positive envromental impacts of iron ore extraction? This was on of the topics we had to reaserch, but form 3 days of searching throught the net, positive effects iron ore extraction ha on the inviroment could not be found. so if anyone knows about the issue I would be verry greatfull for you input.


the exact question is
What are some positive and negative environmental impacts of this process.

Pleas help, thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe that in general, the environmental impact of any metal extraction and processing is detrimental to the environment, starting with disturbing the environment, then dumping the waste, then chemically extracting the desired metals, then extracting them from the minerals.

Metals are 'unnatural' - they chemically prefer to be oxidized and combined with non-metals in the forum of oxides, sulphides, carbonates, sulphates, and various other compounds.

Of course, our use of technology in a consumer driven economy dictates a strong demand for metals.
 
^ Ok thank you, so no marks taken off by saying there are no positive economic impacts if i explain..right?
 
There are of course positive economic benefits in the sense that metals are used in a variety of products that people use - e.g. various tools and instruments, cooking and food preparation, transportation, building structural materials.

Structural steel made tall buildings (skyscrapers) and long/tall bridges possible!
 
^ sorry I ment enviromental.

Thanks for all your help!
 
The cost of extracting and purifying metals is varied for various reasons, this means that the company might not make profit on the iron ore.
Since there is a ,relatively, large amount of iron ore it is cheap. This means that the company needs to find a lot of it in order to make a profit.
If the country's economy relies heavily on the exporting iron ore, the economy is vulnerable because it is effected by the global demand for the iron.

would these be sutible negative ecomonical impacts
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top