Is a 2x2 Complex Matrix with N^2=0 Always Similar to a Specific Form?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alupsaiu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Alupsaiu
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Suppose N is a 2x2 complex matrix such that N^2=0. Prove that either N=0 or N is similar over C to the matrix

00
10Sorry, I don't know how else to write the matrix in the post. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If N is not zero, then it exists a vector v such that Nv is not zero. Using the fact that N^2=0 it is easy to proove that v and Nv are linearly independent (try it), so they are a basis of C^2. Try writing N with respect to this basis.
 
Ok, so it was easy to show linear independence, then I found the matrix which had in the first column the coordinates of Nv, and in the second column 0 since N^2=0.
So,

x1 0
x2 0, where x1 and x2 are the coordinates of Nv in basis (v, Nv). Would x1 actually turn out to be 0?


But, where to go from here? In general I'm a bit confused on how to show a matrix is similar, or must be similar to another matrix. Again, thank you for the help.
 
If {v, Nv} is your basis, then writing N as a matrix with respect to this basis would be of the form [N(v) N(Nv)] where N(v) and N(Nv) are column vectors. If you use the fact that N^2= 0, the rest will follow.

As for showing similarity, recall that matrices are self similar even after change of basis.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top