Is a Backflow Valve Necessary for Swimming Pool Levels?

  • Thread starter Thread starter talk2glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Levels Swimming
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the necessity of a backflow prevention valve located above the peak water level of a swimming pool's self-leveling pump. The main question raised is whether this valve is redundant, given that the pool is not pressurized and water typically reaches an equilibrium height in the piping. Concerns are noted about external forces, such as strong winds or sudden movements in the pool, potentially causing water to flow towards the valve. The principle that "water seeks its own level" is acknowledged, but it is emphasized that this only holds true under equal external forces. Ultimately, the effectiveness and necessity of the valve in preventing contamination are questioned.
talk2glenn
On Swimming Pool Levels...

Alright, this should be a simple enough question.

Per code, the pipe which feeds my swimming pools self-leveling pump has a valve to prevent back flow, so swimming pool water does not contaminate the residential main. However, the valve is located at a point physically higher than the peak water level in the pool.

My question is, is this valve redundant? Since the pool isn't pressurized, it seems to me that the water would generally reach an equilibrium height in the piping equal to the level in the pool. Is there some kind of vacuum pressure or other siphon effect that would ever cause the pool water to climb higher and spill back into the system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


First thing I would think of are strong winds or someone jumping into the pool right next to the water. This could result in a small amount of pool water flowing to the valve.
 


There is considerably more atmospheric pressure pressing down on the pool surface than there is resistance to it in the pipe leading to the valve.
Recall that "water seeks its own level" is only true when external forces are equal.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top