Is a Radio Wave Raser Feasible and How Would It Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisAndre
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The feasibility of creating a radio wave "raser," akin to a laser but for radio frequencies, is debated, particularly regarding the generation of coherent waves at low frequencies like 32 kHz. While masers exist for microwave frequencies, conventional lasers struggle at lower frequencies due to insufficient energy per photon for stimulated emission. Generating coherent radiation at 32 kHz is possible, but the long wavelength necessitates large antennas for efficient emission. The accuracy of such a system could be enhanced using stable frequency references, such as 32.768 kHz crystals. However, targeting precision remains a challenge due to the extensive wavelength, making it difficult to focus on small areas.
ChrisAndre
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
"Raser": Is it Possible?

Is it possible to make a "raser" (Radio Amplification by Stimulated Emission), or what we know now as a laser, but in the form of radio waves? How would this be achieved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Depends what wavelength you are calling radio - the first 'lasers' were microwave
 


Microwaves? Cool! Say 32KHz frequency. Is there a way to generate coherent waves at this frequency? How accurate would this be?
 


Indeed...masers are microwave-frequency lasers.

At lower frequencies, a conventional laser probably isn't workable...not enough energy per photon to stimulate emission in the usual manner. Coherent radiation at these frequencies is easy to produce more directly, though...you could draw some analogies between a laser/maser tube and an oscillator circuit, though the mechanism is quite different.
 


ChrisAndre said:
Microwaves? Cool! Say 32KHz frequency. Is there a way to generate coherent waves at this frequency? How accurate would this be?

32 kHz is far, far below microwave frequencies...it's at the bottom of the low frequency band. The main difficulty with generating coherent radiation at this frequency is its long wavelength...you need a large antenna to efficiently emit it.

How accurate would it be in what respect? There's plenty of 32.768 kHz crystals out there that would allow for an extremely stable frequency reference. With a wavelength of 9 km, you're not going to hit a small target with it.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top