Is a single point in R compact?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fraggle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact Point
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the compactness of a single point in the real numbers, R. Participants explore the implications of definitions and theorems related to compact sets, particularly in the context of topology.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants assert that a single point is compact due to its closed and bounded nature, referencing the Heine-Borel theorem. Others express uncertainty about the terminology used, questioning whether it is appropriate to refer to a point as compact or to clarify that it is a singleton set that is compact.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing different perspectives on the definition of compactness and its application to single points. There is a mix of agreement and humor regarding the rigor of arguments presented, and some participants suggest that using certain theorems may overlook deeper understanding.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential conventions or preferences among educators regarding the use of specific theorems to demonstrate compactness, indicating a possible divide in pedagogical approaches.

fraggle
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Is a single point in R compact?

It seems obvious since every open cover of a single point in R can clearly have a finite subcover.

However, I have a little uncertainty (i.e possible convention that says otherwise?) so just wanted to check before using it in a proof.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A subset of R is compact if it is closed and bounded (Heine Borel). A set consisting of a single point is certainly bounded and closed and therefore compact
 
It seems obvious since every open cover of a single point in R can clearly have a finite subcover.

That's it. No more work needed

VeeEight said:
A subset of R is compact if it is closed and bounded (Heine Borel). A set consisting of a single point is certainly bounded and closed and therefore compact

I would probably fail anyone using this argument on principle
 
Technical point: it makes no sense to talk about a point being compact. What you mean is that a set containing a single point (a "singleton" set) is compact. That's true in any topology, not just R or even just in a metric space. Given any open cover for {a}, there exist at least one set in the cover that contains a and that set alone is a "finite subcover".
 
Office_Shredder said:
I would probably fail anyone using this argument on principle

And I would say you would be in error to do so.

What would you say to this:

Let p be the point. We know that there is some compact space K. The map defined by f(x) = p for all x \in K is continuous. The continuous image of a compact set is compact. Therefore \{p\} is compact. QED
 
g_edgar said:
And I would say you would be in error to do so.

I was mostly being humorous. However, I know a lot of teachers that specifically don't want people to use Heine-Borel to prove the compactness of sets because it misses the point (which is to demonstrate your knowledge of what compactness means).
 
g_edgar said:
And I would say you would be in error to do so.

What would you say to this:

Let p be the point. We know that there is some compact space K. The map defined by f(x) = p for all x \in K is continuous. The continuous image of a compact set is compact. Therefore \{p\} is compact. QED
Oh, surely you can find an even more complicated proof than that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K