Is a Vector Orthogonal to a Timelike Vector Necessarily Spacelike?

kontejnjer
Messages
71
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement


Show that if x^{\mu} is timelike and x^{\mu}y_{\mu}=0, y^{\mu}\neq 0, then y^\mu is spacelike.

Homework Equations


ds^2=\\>0\hspace{0.5cm}\text{timelike}\\<0\hspace{0.5cm}\text{spacelike}\\0\hspace{0.5cm}\text{lightlike}
metric is diag (+---)

The Attempt at a Solution



Don't know if this is the correct way, but here goes: assuming that x^\mu is timelike, we can pick a reference frame in which x^\mu=(x^0,\vec{0}), so due to invariance x^{\mu}y_{\mu}=x^0 y_0=0\rightarrow y^0=0, but, since it is stated that y^{\mu}\neq 0, then \vec{y}\neq 0, and hence we have y^\mu y_\mu=y^i y_i=-(\vec y)^2<0, making y^\mu indeed spacelike. Am I missing something here or is this the right procedure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your procedure is fine.
 
  • Like
Likes kontejnjer
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top