Is Age a Barrier for Pursuing a Career in Civil Engineering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kstbts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineer
AI Thread Summary
At 40 years old, an individual is planning to pursue a degree in civil engineering after a three-year preparation period, during which they are relearning physics and calculus. They express a strong passion for the field and are undeterred by age-related concerns, acknowledging that it will take about four years to complete their degree, making them 47 upon graduation. The discussion highlights the challenges faced by older students entering engineering, including potential questions about their late entry, commitment to the field, and readiness for entry-level positions alongside younger peers. Despite these challenges, the consensus is that it is never too late to pursue a new career, especially if driven by genuine interest. The importance of having a solid skill set, particularly in computer skills, is emphasized, along with the need for resilience in a demanding job environment. Overall, the conversation encourages pursuing one's passion regardless of age, while also preparing for the realities of entering a competitive field.
kstbts
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm 40 yrs old, and it will still be another 3yrs before I can return to school, but I think I've finally figured out what I want to be when I grow up - a civil engineer. I'm using this time to relearn Physics and calculus. A part of me doesn't care if I'm too old, the same part that shrugs off doubts about whether I am smart enough, because this is what I am passionate about and I'll continue to pursue this interest one way or another. But I would still like to know if I will face many significant challenges due to my age if I try to pursue it formally. While I do have over 100 credit hrs, those are mostly not applicable to this degree, and so it will still take me about 4yrs to finish school making me 47 yrs old when I graduate. I should probably mention that I'm female.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heya :smile:

You know better about your life and your financial status and all that (I mean if you are comfortable in perusing it then do it!). But I will tell you one thing. My friend, who is 30 years old graduated high school 12 years ago. Then he worked at various places and fiiiinally decided to join university were he was required to study for a foundation degree at the university. Now he is a second year mechanical engineering undergraduate :smile:

Excuse my English.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
It is never too late, but when entering a new field late, you will need to be prepared to answer some tough questions convincingly:

1. Why are you entering engineering so late?
2. Is your heart really in it?
3. Do you intend to make a career in engineering?
4. Are you ok with being on the same level (pay, position) as people half your age?
5. Do you have the proper basic skillset to be productive (computer skills, for example).
6. Do you have the intestinal fortitude needed for a high pressure, fast growth entry-level job?

Engineering is broad, though, and different jobs will have different levels of issue with these questions.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Even at 47 you will still be a pup with another ~18 productive years left in you. I say go for it.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks everyone.

russ_watters, you raise a possibility which I hadn't considered, which is that I might be questioned about this at some point. The primary reason for entering so late is that I've been educating my children. Also, civil engineering wasn't offered at my university when I attended 15 years ago and I didn't know much about it. My heart is definitely in it; I wouldn't return to school so late if it weren't. I don't care about pay; I'd still want to do it even if I made minimum wage. I feel like my computer skills are better than average, although I don't know any programming. I'll have to give your last question some thought. I'm sure I'm at least average in that area.


russ_watters said:
It is never too late, but when entering a new field late, you will need to be prepared to answer some tough questions convincingly:

1. Why are you entering engineering so late?
2. Is your heart really in it?
3. Do you intend to make a career in engineering?
4. Are you ok with being on the same level (pay, position) as people half your age?
5. Do you have the proper basic skillset to be productive (computer skills, for example).
6. Do you have the intestinal fortitude needed for a high pressure, fast growth entry-level job?

Engineering is broad, though, and different jobs will have different levels of issue with these questions.
 
kstbts tells this:

I don't care about pay; I'd still want to do it even if I made minimum wage.

Your "heart" can be understood, but you should not be expected to take an inexcusably exploitatively low salary or wage.

I feel like my computer skills are better than average, although I don't know any programming.

What does that mean?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top