Is Atomic Decay the Universal Standard for Measuring Seconds?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JeffCyr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Decay
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of measuring time, specifically whether atomic decay serves as a universal standard for defining a second. Participants explore the relationship between atomic decay and the official definition of a second, considering its applicability across the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls that the official length of a second is based on atomic decay, questioning if this is accurate and if there is a specific element used for this measurement.
  • Another participant provides a link to a resource for further clarification on the definition of a second.
  • A participant seeks confirmation on whether one second corresponds to 9,192,631,770 changes in energy levels of a cesium atom at absolute zero, indicating uncertainty about the specifics of the measurement.
  • A later reply confirms the participant's understanding of the relationship between cesium atom energy changes and the definition of a second.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains some agreement on the relationship between atomic decay and the measurement of a second, particularly regarding cesium atoms, but there remains uncertainty about the broader implications and universality of this measurement.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specifics of atomic decay and its role in defining a second, highlighting the need for clarity on definitions and conditions under which these measurements apply.

JeffCyr
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I recall hearing somewhere that the official length of a second was now kept by the measure of how much an atom of a certain material or isotope decays, such as "When X decays by Y it equals one second"

For the novel I'm writing I need a means to measure seconds that would be completely universal no matter where one would be in the universe, so recalling this I figured the decay of some element would be the best way to measure it.

Am I recalling it right that some element's decay is the official measurement of a second? Whether it is or not, is there such an element that could be used for it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you, although that's a bit of unknown for me. Does that mean that 1 second is the span of 9 192 631 770 change in energy levels of a cesium atom at 0 kelvin?
 
JeffCyr said:
Thank you, although that's a bit of unknown for me. Does that mean that 1 second is the span of 9 192 631 770 change in energy levels of a cesium atom at 0 kelvin?
Pretty much, yes.
 
Ah thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K