Is Bohr's Model Accurate for the Hydrogen Atom?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rumaithya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model
AI Thread Summary
Bohr's model of the hydrogen atom provides a foundational understanding of electron energy levels, accurately predicting the differences between energy levels corresponding to transitions between principal quantum numbers. Initially developed in the early 20th century, the model's predictions were confirmed through experimental data, particularly in the context of hydrogen. However, as spectroscopy techniques advanced, discrepancies emerged, notably with phenomena such as the Zeeman effect, anomalous Zeeman effect, hyperfine structure, and the Lamb shift, which the Bohr model could not adequately explain. While Bohr's rules effectively predicted energy levels for hydrogen, they fell short for more complex atoms, highlighting the model's limitations. Overall, Bohr's contributions remain significant, but further developments in quantum mechanics have provided a more comprehensive understanding of atomic behavior.
rumaithya
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Does Bohr's Model appear to accurately reflect the energy aspects of the hydrogen atom ?

I need an evidence to support the answer. :confused:

Thanks :}
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I am going by memory, so don't trust me on this...

Bohr's model, which preceded the Schodinger equation, was able to give fairly accurate differences between energy levels of electrons making a transition between different principle quantum numbers. This was around the time of the First World War. As experimental techniques of spectroscopy improved, more discrepancies were found between experimental data and the predictions of the Bohr model. I am thinking of things like: Zeeman effect, anomalous Zeeman effect, hyperfine structure, and Lamb shift.

Others here will know more details on this.

EDITED: Spelling: Zeeman, not Zeman.
 
Last edited:
I forget what Bohr's rules were but he was accurately able to predict the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. But only for hydrogen.

Look up his rules...
They're something like (1/n) + (1/n+1) = 1 or something.

I remember doing an experiment in my lab and the energy levels he predicted using his rule were experimentally proven to be correct. I'm tired and am having trouble remembering what we did but a simple search should answer this question.
 
Thank you all .. That helped me a lot :)
 
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
Back
Top