Is Calculus a Smooth Transition After Mastering Trig and Algebra 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brady
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Teaching
AI Thread Summary
Understanding complex numbers involves recognizing that they can be represented as vectors on the Gaussian coordinate plane, where the real part is plotted on the x-axis and the imaginary part on the y-axis. The transformation from a complex number like 3+5i to the point (3,5) illustrates this vector representation. Transitioning to calculus after mastering trigonometry and Algebra 2 is not necessarily smooth, as calculus introduces more complex concepts and formulas. However, it is primarily an extension of algebra, so it may not be as daunting as it seems. Overall, grasping the relationship between complex numbers and their vector representation is crucial for further mathematical studies.
Brady
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm in the complex numbers section of a trig book, and I'm having trouble intuitively understanding how a number like 3+5i can become (3,5) on the Gaussian coordinate plane...the logic behind it doesn't jump out at me...

Any help?

And is calculus generally a smooth transition after mastering trig and algebra 2, or is it something totally different?

Thanks a lot,
Brady Yoon :redface:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Brady said:
Hi, I'm in the complex numbers section of a trig book, and I'm having trouble intuitively understanding how a number like 3+5i can become (3,5) on the Gaussian coordinate plane...the logic behind it doesn't jump out at me...


ummm. The idea of the Gaussian plane is to represent complex numbers as vectors. We chose the x-axis to host the real part of the complex number and the y-axis to host the imaginary part. Thus a complex number a+bi has the vector representation (a,b) in the Gaussian plane.


though you might not completely understand this, I will add that \mathbb{C} and \mathbb{R}^2, as groups, are isomorphic to one another [according to the isomorphism that assigns to each complex number its corresponding vector in the Gaussian plane: f(a+bi) = (a,b)].
Maybe someone else can extrapolate on what intesresting things this implies; I'd be interested. Thx.
 
Last edited:
a smooth translation from trig is non existent. calculus is just a lot of algebra with a few more formulas thrown in. don't let it scare you though, it isn't as hard as you think
 
That's just a way of representing the complex numbers. Just as we can think of real numbers as numbers on a "number line", since every complex number, a+ bi, requires two real numbers, we need two number lines to represent complex number. It happens to be simplest to make those number lines perpendicular. The complex number a+bi is represented by the pair (a,b) in an obvious way and that corresponds to the point with coordinates (a, b).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top