Is Change of Basis the Solution to My Linear Algebra Problem?

TranscendArcu
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Skjermbilde_2012_03_11_kl_8_22_13_PM.png


The Attempt at a Solution


So first I thought to myself that the proper way of doing this problem was to construct each of the standard basis vectors as a linear combination of the basis given us. I have,

T(1,0,0) = \frac{1}{2} T(1,0,1) + \frac{1}{2} T(1,0,-1) = (\frac{3}{2},0,1)
T(0,1,0) = (0,-1,0)
T(0,0,1) = \frac{1}{2}T(1,0,1) - \frac{1}{2} T(1,0,-1) = (\frac{3}{2},0,-1)

Thus I have the matrix with columns that are the images of the standard basis vectors.

However, it seems conceivable that I should also be able to do this problem via change of basis. I have, taking the bases in matrix form,

\left| \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1&amp;0&amp;1 \\<br /> 0&amp;1&amp;0 \\<br /> 1&amp;0&amp;-1 \end{array} \right|

I have the transformation relative to the basis:

\left| \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 3&amp;0&amp;0 \\<br /> 0&amp;-1&amp;0 \\<br /> 0&amp;0&amp;2 \end{array} \right|

and the inverse of the basis matrix,

\left| \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1/2&amp;0&amp;1/2 \\<br /> 0&amp;1&amp;0 \\<br /> 1/2&amp;0&amp;-1/2 \end{array} \right|

If I compose the matrices to find the matrix composition, I have

\left| \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1/2&amp;0&amp;1/2 \\<br /> 0&amp;1&amp;0 \\<br /> 1/2&amp;0&amp;-1/2 \end{array} \right|\left| \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 3&amp;0&amp;0 \\<br /> 0&amp;-1&amp;0 \\<br /> 0&amp;0&amp;2 \end{array} \right|\left| \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1&amp;0&amp;1 \\<br /> 0&amp;1&amp;0 \\<br /> 1&amp;0&amp;-1 \end{array} \right| = \left| \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 5/2&amp;0&amp;1/2 \\<br /> 0&amp;-1&amp;0 \\<br /> 1/2&amp;0&amp;5/2 \end{array} \right|

But clearly, my results for the two matrices are not identical, so what have I done wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your results for T(1,0,0) and the rest of the basis vectors are still expressed in terms of the given basis. In other words, the coordinate vector (3/2, 0, 1) corresponds to 3/2(1,0,1) + 1(1, 0,-1) = (5/2, 0, 1/2) with respect to the canonical basis.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top