Is Completing All Practice Problems Essential for Self-Learning Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pooka12321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Self
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the necessity of completing practice problems in Spivak's calculus book for effective self-learning. Participants explore the balance between problem-solving and understanding theoretical concepts, particularly in the context of proof-writing skills.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that completing as many problems as possible enhances understanding.
  • Another participant expresses difficulty with proof-writing, indicating that this skill is crucial for tackling many problems in the book.
  • A different participant shares a resource they found that may assist in transitioning to rigorous mathematics, though they express uncertainty about its effectiveness for Spivak's material.
  • There is a mention of a specific book that covers foundational mathematical concepts, which some believe could be beneficial for students struggling with proofs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the necessity of completing all practice problems, and there are differing views on the importance of proof-writing skills in understanding calculus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight their challenges with proof-writing and the need for additional resources, indicating that there may be gaps in foundational knowledge that affect their ability to engage with the problems effectively.

pooka12321
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am teaching myself calculus from Spivak's book.
I am wondering if it is necessary to do all or 1/2 of the problems in the book to gain a good understanding of calculus.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do as many as you can. The more you do, the better you understand.
 
Thanks for the above link, I hope it helps me.

I found this set of books which looks like it would help a lot.

If you go ahead and use it please post here & tell me how it's going for you.

I'm too busy right now to read this but I will in a while, it looks like it'd help me out with Spivak but I could be wrong.

From the description;

This book helps the student complete the transition from purely manipulative to rigorous mathematics. The clear exposition covers many topics that are assumed by later courses but are often not covered with any depth or organization:

Here is a quote from another book on this site, the author has condensed the book into an intro for his Real Analysis book;

For students who need a review of basic mathematical concepts before beginning "epsilon-delta"-style proofs, the text begins with material on set theory (sets, quantifiers, relations and mappings, countable sets), the real numbers (axioms, natural numbers, induction, consequences of the completeness axiom), and Euclidean and vector spaces; this material is condensed from the author's Basic Concepts of Mathematics, the complete version of which can be used as supplementary background material for the present text.

From - http://www.trillia.com/zakon-analysisI.html

Here is the link to the book he is talking about,

http://www.trillia.com/zakon1.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K