MHB Is D3 Abelian Based on Its Cayley Table?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\textsf{Write out a complete Cayley table for $D_3$. Is $D_3$ Abelian?}$
$$
\begin{array}{ l | l l l l l l}
&R_0 &R_{120} &R_{240} &V &D_L &D_R\\
\hline
R_0 & R_0 & R_{120} &R_{240} & V &D_L &D_R\\
R_{120} & R_{120} & R_{240} &R_0 &D_L &D_R & V\\
R_{240} & R_{240} & R_0 &R_{120} &D_R & V &D_L\\
V & V &D_R &D_L & R_0 &R_{240} & R_{120}\\
D_L &D_L & V &D_R &R_{120} & R_0 &R_{240}\\
D_R &D_R &D_L & V &R_{240} & R_{120}& R_0
\end{array}
%$$
$\textsf{Is $D_3$ Abelian?}$

all I know is if it is Abelian then $AB=BA$ in all choices... so ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\textsf{Write out a complete Cayley table for $D_3$. Is $D_3$ Abelian?}$
$$
\begin{array}{ l | l l l l l l}
&R_0 &R_{120} &R_{240} &V &D_L &D_R\\
\hline
R_0 & R_0 & R_{120} &R_{240} & V &D_L &D_R\\
R_{120} & R_{120} & R_{240} &R_0 &D_L &D_R & V\\
R_{240} & R_{240} & R_0 &R_{120} &D_R & V &D_L\\
V & V &D_R &D_L & R_0 &R_{240} & R_{120}\\
D_L &D_L & V &D_R &R_{120} & R_0 &R_{240}\\
D_R &D_R &D_L & V &R_{240} & R_{120}& R_0
\end{array}
%$$
$\textsf{Is $D_3$ Abelian?}$

all I know is if it is Abelian then $AB=BA$ in all choices... so ?
Correct. So what is [math]V \cdot R_{120}[/math]? What is [math]R_{120} \cdot V[/math]?

This isn't always true but usually if you have an inversion or mirror plane the group is non-Abelian. They are usually the first things you want to check.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Correct. So what is [math]V \cdot R_{120}[/math]? What is [math]R_{120} \cdot V[/math]?

This isn't always true but usually if you have an inversion or mirror plane the group is non-Abelian. They are usually the first things you want to check.

-Dan

the last 3 rows seem to indicate inversion
 
karush said:
the last 3 rows seem to indicate inversion
Yup. Mind you, it doesn't always mean that the group is non-Abelian. Consider the group [math]\{ I, R_{180}, i, \sigma _z \}[/math]. (I don't recall the name for this one.) I is the identity, [math]R_{180}[/math] is the rotatin of 180 degrees, i is inversion [math](x, y, z) \to (-x, -y, -z)[/math], and [math]\sigma _z[/math] is the mirror plane over the xy plane.

It's got an inversion as well as a mirror plane, yet it's Abelian. This group is isomorphic to [math]Z_4[/math].

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Yup. Mind you, it doesn't always mean that the group is non-Abelian. Consider the group [math]\{ I, R_{180}, i, \sigma _z \}[/math]. (I don't recall the name for this one.) I is the identity, [math]R_{180}[/math] is the rotatin of 180 degrees, i is inversion [math](x, y, z) \to (-x, -y, -z)[/math], and [math]\sigma _z[/math] is the mirror plane over the xy plane.

It's got an inversion as well as a mirror plane, yet it's Abelian. This group is isomorphic to [math]Z_4[/math].

-Dan

what is [math]\sigma _z[/math] and [math]Z_4[/math]
I shud know but don't
 
karush said:
what is [math]\sigma _z[/math] and [math]Z_4[/math]
I shud know but don't
The group elements are operations; they operate on a set of points. So say we have a point at (1, 1, 1). Then

Identity: I (1, 1, 1) = (1, 1, 1)
Rotation about 180 degrees: [math]R_{180} (1, 1, 1) = (-1, -1, 1)[/math]
Inversion: i (1, 1, 1) = (-1, -1, -1)
Mirror plane: This a reflection of the point over the xy plane: [math]\sigma _z (1, 1, 1) = (1, 1, -1)[/math]

So we have 4 points in space. (I'll leave it to you to check that this is actually a group.)

[math]Z_4[/math] is an Abelian group of four elements, the binary operation usually taken to be addition. The elements of this group are 0, 1, 2, 3. This is isomorphic to the modular group (mod 4), [math]\mathbb{Z} / 4 \mathbb{Z}[/math]. (If you don't know what that is, don't worry.)

[math]\begin{array}{c||c|c|c|c}
Z_4^+ & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 \\
\hline \hline
0 & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 \\
1 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 0 \\
2 & 2 & 3 & 0 & 1 \\
3 & 3 & 0 & 1 & 2 \\
\end{array}
[/math]

-Dan
 
I'm sorry, I gave you the wrong group. It's not [math]Z_4[/math] that is isomorphic to the point group I brought up, it's V, the Klein 4-group.
[math]\begin{array}{c||c|c|c|c|}
V & e & a & b & c \\
\hline \hline
e & e & a & b & c \\
a & a & e & c & b \\
b & b & c & e & a \\
c & c & b & a & e
\end{array}
[/math]

where e is the identity element for the group. The way you can tell that this point group isn't [math]Z_4[/math] is that each element is its own inverse.

Again, my apologies for the confusion!

-Dan
 
Back
Top