MHB Is D3 Abelian Based on Its Cayley Table?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the dihedral group D3 is Abelian, based on its Cayley table. Participants analyze the properties of group elements, particularly focusing on the operations involving the reflection and rotation elements. It is noted that groups with inversions or mirror planes often tend to be non-Abelian, but exceptions exist, such as the Klein four-group, which is also mentioned. The conversation highlights the importance of checking specific element combinations to determine the group's structure. Ultimately, the conclusion leans towards D3 being non-Abelian due to its characteristics.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\textsf{Write out a complete Cayley table for $D_3$. Is $D_3$ Abelian?}$
$$
\begin{array}{ l | l l l l l l}
&R_0 &R_{120} &R_{240} &V &D_L &D_R\\
\hline
R_0 & R_0 & R_{120} &R_{240} & V &D_L &D_R\\
R_{120} & R_{120} & R_{240} &R_0 &D_L &D_R & V\\
R_{240} & R_{240} & R_0 &R_{120} &D_R & V &D_L\\
V & V &D_R &D_L & R_0 &R_{240} & R_{120}\\
D_L &D_L & V &D_R &R_{120} & R_0 &R_{240}\\
D_R &D_R &D_L & V &R_{240} & R_{120}& R_0
\end{array}
%$$
$\textsf{Is $D_3$ Abelian?}$

all I know is if it is Abelian then $AB=BA$ in all choices... so ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\textsf{Write out a complete Cayley table for $D_3$. Is $D_3$ Abelian?}$
$$
\begin{array}{ l | l l l l l l}
&R_0 &R_{120} &R_{240} &V &D_L &D_R\\
\hline
R_0 & R_0 & R_{120} &R_{240} & V &D_L &D_R\\
R_{120} & R_{120} & R_{240} &R_0 &D_L &D_R & V\\
R_{240} & R_{240} & R_0 &R_{120} &D_R & V &D_L\\
V & V &D_R &D_L & R_0 &R_{240} & R_{120}\\
D_L &D_L & V &D_R &R_{120} & R_0 &R_{240}\\
D_R &D_R &D_L & V &R_{240} & R_{120}& R_0
\end{array}
%$$
$\textsf{Is $D_3$ Abelian?}$

all I know is if it is Abelian then $AB=BA$ in all choices... so ?
Correct. So what is [math]V \cdot R_{120}[/math]? What is [math]R_{120} \cdot V[/math]?

This isn't always true but usually if you have an inversion or mirror plane the group is non-Abelian. They are usually the first things you want to check.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Correct. So what is [math]V \cdot R_{120}[/math]? What is [math]R_{120} \cdot V[/math]?

This isn't always true but usually if you have an inversion or mirror plane the group is non-Abelian. They are usually the first things you want to check.

-Dan

the last 3 rows seem to indicate inversion
 
karush said:
the last 3 rows seem to indicate inversion
Yup. Mind you, it doesn't always mean that the group is non-Abelian. Consider the group [math]\{ I, R_{180}, i, \sigma _z \}[/math]. (I don't recall the name for this one.) I is the identity, [math]R_{180}[/math] is the rotatin of 180 degrees, i is inversion [math](x, y, z) \to (-x, -y, -z)[/math], and [math]\sigma _z[/math] is the mirror plane over the xy plane.

It's got an inversion as well as a mirror plane, yet it's Abelian. This group is isomorphic to [math]Z_4[/math].

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Yup. Mind you, it doesn't always mean that the group is non-Abelian. Consider the group [math]\{ I, R_{180}, i, \sigma _z \}[/math]. (I don't recall the name for this one.) I is the identity, [math]R_{180}[/math] is the rotatin of 180 degrees, i is inversion [math](x, y, z) \to (-x, -y, -z)[/math], and [math]\sigma _z[/math] is the mirror plane over the xy plane.

It's got an inversion as well as a mirror plane, yet it's Abelian. This group is isomorphic to [math]Z_4[/math].

-Dan

what is [math]\sigma _z[/math] and [math]Z_4[/math]
I shud know but don't
 
karush said:
what is [math]\sigma _z[/math] and [math]Z_4[/math]
I shud know but don't
The group elements are operations; they operate on a set of points. So say we have a point at (1, 1, 1). Then

Identity: I (1, 1, 1) = (1, 1, 1)
Rotation about 180 degrees: [math]R_{180} (1, 1, 1) = (-1, -1, 1)[/math]
Inversion: i (1, 1, 1) = (-1, -1, -1)
Mirror plane: This a reflection of the point over the xy plane: [math]\sigma _z (1, 1, 1) = (1, 1, -1)[/math]

So we have 4 points in space. (I'll leave it to you to check that this is actually a group.)

[math]Z_4[/math] is an Abelian group of four elements, the binary operation usually taken to be addition. The elements of this group are 0, 1, 2, 3. This is isomorphic to the modular group (mod 4), [math]\mathbb{Z} / 4 \mathbb{Z}[/math]. (If you don't know what that is, don't worry.)

[math]\begin{array}{c||c|c|c|c}
Z_4^+ & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 \\
\hline \hline
0 & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 \\
1 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 0 \\
2 & 2 & 3 & 0 & 1 \\
3 & 3 & 0 & 1 & 2 \\
\end{array}
[/math]

-Dan
 
I'm sorry, I gave you the wrong group. It's not [math]Z_4[/math] that is isomorphic to the point group I brought up, it's V, the Klein 4-group.
[math]\begin{array}{c||c|c|c|c|}
V & e & a & b & c \\
\hline \hline
e & e & a & b & c \\
a & a & e & c & b \\
b & b & c & e & a \\
c & c & b & a & e
\end{array}
[/math]

where e is the identity element for the group. The way you can tell that this point group isn't [math]Z_4[/math] is that each element is its own inverse.

Again, my apologies for the confusion!

-Dan
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K