Is Direction Considered in Determining Resultant Electric Field Strength?

AI Thread Summary
The resultant electric field strength at a point is determined by the forces acting on a +1 Coulomb charge placed at that point, with direction being a crucial factor. The attraction and repulsion from surrounding charges create forces that can cancel each other out or combine to produce a net field. Specifically, a negative charge attracts the +1C charge, while a positive charge repels it, leading to an upward resultant field when both effects are considered. The assumption of using a +1C charge is standard in defining electric field strength, and if a negative charge were used instead, the resultant force direction would differ. Understanding the direction of the electric field is essential for accurate calculations, and using unit vectors can simplify the analysis.
v_pino
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
How do I know that the resultant filed strength acts toward Y?

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • physics.JPG
    physics.JPG
    26 KB · Views: 480
Physics news on Phys.org
Definition of electric field strength:

"Field strength at a point O is the force experienced (Here force means both magnitude AND direction) by a charge of +1 Coulomb kept at point O due to all other charges."

Now, suppose a +1 C charge is kept at point O.

Due to -Q charge kept at point Z, the +1C charge at O will experience an attraction (opposite charges attract)

so due to Z, the direction will be towards Z. ( \longleftarrow)

similarly due to charge at X: (\longrightarrow)
These two are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. So both will cancel each other.




The charge at W is positive, so it will repel the +1C charge kept at O. So force on +1C due to W will be in the upward direction.

Again, charge at Y is negative. So it will attract the +1C towards itself (up). So force due to Y is up.

Field due to charges at W and Y will add up to give a resultant field in the upward direction.
 
But this is only the case when we assume that it is +1C at O. If we assume that it is negative that the resultant field strength is downwards. How come we can be sure to make the assumtion that it is +1C?
 
v_pino said:
But this is only the case when we assume that it is +1C at O. If we assume that it is negative that the resultant field strength is downwards. How come we can be sure to make the assumtion that it is +1C?

Electric Field at a point is defined assuming that a +1 C charge is kept at that point. It is written in the standard scientific literature or something. We cannot take electric field to be the force experienced by -1 C charge.

Field strength at a point O is the force experienced by a charge of +1 Coulomb kept at point O due to all other charges.
This is a definition, no one can change it.


But yes, if they specify in the question that -1 C charge is kept at O, then it will not tell you to calculate field, they will tell you to calculate force on -1C instead. In that case, the resultant force will be downwards.
 
the biggest flaw in the way you are solving this question, as google spider said is that you are not at all accounting for the direction of the field. Work in terms of unit vectors \hat{i},~\hat{j}. It'll be much easier.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top