Is Earth's Emitted White Light Continuous in Space?

AI Thread Summary
White light emitted from Earth's surface would indeed have a continuous spectrum when observed from space, as it contains a range of wavelengths without distinct gaps. The concept of continuity in a spectrum refers to the presence of all wavelengths in a smooth transition rather than discrete lines. Observers in space would see the spectrum altered by atmospheric effects, but the fundamental nature of white light remains continuous. A clear explanation of how the observed spectrum differs from the original can enhance understanding. Ultimately, focusing on the characteristics of the spectrum is more crucial than strictly defining "continuous."
JB123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If white light were emitted from Earth's surface and observed by someone in space, would its spectrum be continuous? Explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Homework questions belong in the homework forums ; moreover, don't double-post. All this is explained in the posting guidelines of PF.
 
ok thanks. I just joined the site, I didn't know that.
plus, I wasn't getting any help in the other forum.
 
Start by making sense of the question.
What is white light?
What does continuous mean for a spectrum?

With my own vocabulary, the question looks strange. I would simply answer "yes" because the observed spectrum would certainly contain some continuous parts and therefore I would say it is continuous. But if you have a clear definition, you could do better.

I advise you to be pragmatic and simply explain how the observed spectrum would look like to the observer. Will it be different from the original white spectrum? And why? And how would it look like? ... and finally -if you want- decide about "continuous", but this is not the most important thing.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

White Roof Vs. Black Roof on a house
Replies
1
Views
1K
Why optical pyrometer gives a low reading?
Replies
19
Views
2K
Speed of a star in Special Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
A Why do novas shine?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Spectrum of laser light absorbed and re-emitted by a white object
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Why do only low-pressure gases emit a line spectrum?
Replies
6
Views
3K
What does it mean that when light is reflected the "wavelengths of each contributing hue are subtracted"?
Replies
16
Views
1K
I Creating White LEDs: Phosphor vs RGB
Replies
5
Views
1K
Why Does a Green Glass Plate Absorb Everything Except Green?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Hydrogen Emission Spectrum and Electron Energy Levels
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top