Is electric field radially inwards or outwards

AI Thread Summary
The direction of an electric field is determined by the gradient of the electric potential, with the field pointing in the direction where the potential decreases most rapidly. Specifically, if the potential decreases with increasing distance (dV/dr < 0), the electric field points outward, while if the potential increases with distance (dV/dr > 0), the field points inward. The force on a positively charged test particle aligns with the electric field, whereas it opposes the field for a negatively charged particle. Visual symbols can indicate direction: an "x" means the field is directed into the page, while another symbol indicates it is coming out of the page. Understanding this relationship between electric field and potential simplifies analysis without needing to reference specific viewpoints.
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, ##\vec E## points in the direction that V decreases most rapidly.

In this case, V depends only on r, so ##\vec E## points outwards if V decreases with increasing r (i.e. dV/dr < 0), and inwards if V increases with increasing r (dV/dr > 0).
 
The force on a positively charged test particle is in the direction of the electric field; the force on a negatively charged test particle is opposite to the direction of the electric field. If you're careful with your signs, you'll get the right answer just from doing the calculation because you'll write a negative charge as ##-Q## and the negative sign carries through into the sign of the force - but wise people also take a moment to visualize the setup and make sure that their answer has the force pointing in a sensible direction.
 
Alright man so what the symbols mean are: if it is the "x" symbol it means the field is going into the page (away from you) and if it is the other symbol then it means the field is coming out of the page (at you)
 
Sorthal said:
Alright man so what the symbols mean are: if it is the "x" symbol it means the field is going into the page (away from you) and if it is the other symbol then it means the field is coming out of the page (at you)

It is better to describe the Field in terms of the Potential - that avoids having to think of a 'page' or where you (or I) happen to be standing. Basically:
E = -∇V or the gradient of the Potential. It's the way that a positively charged 'ball' would 'roll', as jibell was hinting.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top