High School Is Energy Truly Quantized in De Broglie's Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter _PJ_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    De broglie Rest
Click For Summary
De Broglie's equations suggest a quantized relationship between energy and wave properties, represented as E = 2.Pi.hbar.c and summarized as E = h.nu. The discussion raises questions about the absence of Lorentz transformations and the relativistic factor gamma in these equations. Additionally, there is confusion regarding the concept of a non-zero ground state and its implications. Participants seek clarification on these points, indicating a need for a deeper understanding of the relationship between quantum mechanics and relativity. The conversation highlights the complexities of integrating these fundamental concepts in physics.
_PJ_
Messages
229
Reaction score
15
Given De Broglie's equations of a quantised wave:

E = 2.Pi.hbar.c

Where:
E = Energy
Pi = PI (Ratio of circumference to radius)
hbar = Planck's constant (Reduced over 2.Pi)
c = celerity, causal displacement per time interval

In most texts this is summarised as:

E = h.nu

Where:
h = Planck's constant
nu = frequency

And E is suggested to be the "total energy"And then further used to imply that it is related by:

E= hf = mc^2

__________

Where is gamma? Why is there no consideration for Lorentz?
How is a non-zero ground state accounted for?
__________
 
Physics news on Phys.org
_PJ_ said:
Where is gamma? Why is there no consideration for Lorentz?
Try this link for the relativistic form of these relationships: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/debrog2.html
How is a non-zero ground state accounted for?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "ground state" here. Can you give an example?
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
636
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K