Is Entropy Extensive in an Ideal Solid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cstang52
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solid
cstang52
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
\frac{}{}

Homework Statement


Starting from S(E,N)=c(N)+3Nk[1+LN(\frac{E}{3Nh\nu})], derive a version of the Entropy, S(E,N) of an ideal solid that is extensive, that is, for which S(\lambdaE,\lambdaN)=\lambdaS(E,N)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Basically have to prove that S(\lambdaE,\lambdaN)=\lambdaS(E,N).

I can set it up, but I don't know how to eliminate terms to get to a form I can work with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have it setup like this:

S(λ E,λ N)=λ S(E,N)

c(λN)+3(λN)k[1+ln\frac{λE}{3(λN)h\nu}]=λ{c(N)+3Nk[1+ln\frac{E}{3Nh\nu}]


But 1. I don't know how to reduce the left side, and
2. when I distribute λ through the right side, is it on everything ending up looking like this: c(λN)+λ(3Nk)[λ+ln\frac{λE}{λ(3Nh\nu)}]? Or something else...
 
cstang52 said:
ending up looking like this: c(λN)+λ(3Nk)[λ+ln\frac{λE}{λ(3Nh\nu)}]
There's one too many lambdas in there:
c(λN)+λ(3Nk)[1+ln\frac{λE}{λ(3Nh\nu)}]
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top