Is Epicyclic an Accurate Term for the Moon's Orbit Around the Sun?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Minki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Epicyclic Moon
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether "epicyclic" accurately describes the Moon's orbit around the Sun. Participants note that "epicycles" primarily refer to historical astronomical models and are not commonly used in modern orbital mechanics. The term is associated with approximations of planetary motion, but the Moon's path is more complex than a simple ellipse. Some suggest that the Moon's orbit may appear complicated when viewed from certain reference frames, such as the Earth-Moon center-of-mass. Ultimately, the term "epicyclic" is not typically applied to the Moon's orbit in contemporary discussions.
Minki
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Hi, A quick clarification question. Is epicyclic a correct description for our moons path around the sun. I can only find references to epicycles in a historical context.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Minki! :smile:
Minki said:
I can only find references to epicycles in a historical context.

Epicycles are an approximation … the number of cycles gives you the order of the approximation.

The only actual epicylces I know of are what are usually called planetary gears, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicyclic_gearing :wink:
 
Focus on what it means for an orbit to be epicyclic and you can answer the question yourself.

example of a modern use.

But perhaps you are thinking that, maybe, the Moon's orbit (in, say, the reference frame of the Earth-Moon center-of-mass) traces out some sort of complicated scribble rather than a simple ellipse?
 
Ok, thanks for that guys.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top