Is Exponential Needed for Non-Repeating Variable in Buckingham Pi Theorem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether an exponent is necessary for non-repeating variables in the Buckingham Pi Theorem, specifically regarding the variable delta P. One source suggests that an exponent should be included for non-repeating variables, while another indicates that it is not required. The confusion arises from differing interpretations of dimensional analysis principles. Participants seek clarification on which approach is correct and whether an exponent for the non-repeating variable is essential. Ultimately, the debate highlights the nuances in applying the Buckingham Pi Theorem to dimensional analysis.
foo9008
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


https://projects.exeter.ac.uk/fluidflow/Courses/FluidDynamics3211-2/DimensionalAnalysis/dimensionalLecturese4.htmlaccording to this link , when we form the pi group , we need to put an exponent for the non-repeating variable ,( in this case , delta P is non-repeating variable , D , v and rho are repeating variable)
FXVC7K7.png
http://www.efm.leeds.ac.uk/CIVE/CIVE1400/Section5/dimensional_analysis.htm (refer to 7 )however , in this case , we do not have to put exponent on the non-repeating variable , the author just putF = (MLT^-2 ) instead of (MLT^-2)^d
k9bJMDc.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Which is correct ? the first or second one ? is exponential needed for non-repeating variable ?
P/s : this is not same as the question i posted in another thread...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump
 
anyone can reply ?
 
which is correct ?
 
bump
 
is it necessary to put exponent of d ? ??
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Choosing repeating variable in pi Buckingham theorem
Replies
24
Views
4K
Rules of choosing repeating variable in Buckingham pi theorem
Replies
5
Views
10K
Buckingham Pi Theorem: Choosing Common Variables
Replies
1
Views
2K
Variable Set Distribution - Buckingham Pi Theorum
Replies
1
Views
995

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top