Is Gibbs Energy Truly Equivalent to Work?

freek_g
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm preparing for my exams in a few weeks, of which one covers Thermodynamics.

I was trying to solve a question, where I noticed the Gibb's free energy had to equal the (negative) work. I kind of came to an answer, but was not sure if I did it the right way. All steps are reversible.

First, from the ideal gas law : $$ pV = nRT$$
Then, if I differentiate both sides: $$d(pV) = d(nRT)$$
$$ dpV = -pdV$$

So, let's hold that thought. Now for the Gibb's free energy (with T = constant): $$ dG = dH - TdS$$
And because ##H = U + pV##: $$ dG = dU + d(pV) - TdS$$
Now, ## U = q + w = q - pdV##: $$dG = q - pdV + dpV + pdV - TdS$$

Because ##q = q_{rev} = TdS##: $$ dG = q_{rev} + dpV - q_{rev} = dpV$$

Then, from the beginning: $$dG = dpV = -pdV = - w_{rev}$$

So my question, am I right with this reasoning?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your third equation (which would be more clearly written ##V\,dp=-p\,dV##) already assumes constant temperature, right? Otherwise, I don't know how you're getting it.

Also, your first equation for Gibbs free energy is incorrect; you've mixed up ##T## and ##S##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top