Is Gravity Enlarged at Small Distances?

  • Thread starter Thread starter exponent137
  • Start date Start date
exponent137
Messages
562
Reaction score
35
Are exist some theories that G is enlarged at very small distances?
Can you give some links?

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
exponent137 said:
Are exist some theories that G is enlarged at very small distances?
Can you give some links?

Regards

Well G runs but it may well get smaller not larger depending on who you ask...
 
All sorts of theories exist. Experimentally, significant scale-dependent variations in G (dG/G~1) are ruled out down to approx. 0.05 mm.
 
I have NOT read of an increasing G at small distances.

In some multidimensional theories there is theory that G may leak to other dimensions, even parallel universes, and that that happens even at larger everyday scales...and might be a reason gravity is the weakest of known forces...

THREE ROADS TO QUANTUM GRAVITY by Lee Smolin is a modern popular non mathematical treatment...meaning three theories...

to probe gravity at sub microscopic lengths, Smolin feels a background independent framework is required, meaning the space and time must be formulated as dynamical relationships, not like a rigid lattice for example.

In addition as you approach Planck size, it would appear that everything we know may disappear in quantum foam; length, time, forces become indistinguishable, and hence appear might weaken at near the ultimate microscopic dimensions in the vicinity of
10-33 cm.
 
I should have also mentioned: we know that quantum mechanics and general relativity encounter irregularities (infinities) in the vicincity of singularities like the big bang and black hole centers..where space and time become incredibly curved/distorted/ and lose some of their everyday characteristics...so either something is wrong with those formulations or something is wrong with each of QM and GR...
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top