Is hydraulic jack violation of thoermodynamics

  • Thread starter Thread starter mashhood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydraulic
AI Thread Summary
Using a hydraulic jack to lift a car demonstrates the principles of force and energy, where less force is required to lift a heavier load. When the jack handle is moved down a greater distance than the car is lifted, the energy input is conserved, but the force applied is significantly reduced. This illustrates that while energy is conserved, force can vary based on the mechanical advantage provided by the hydraulic system. The discussion clarifies that conservation of energy applies, but there is no corresponding conservation of force. Overall, hydraulic jacks effectively allow for lifting heavy objects with minimal input force.
mashhood
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
when i use hydralick jack to lift up my car i put less energy and pick up heavey car ,so am i geting more by puting less in a hydralick system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are confusing "force" with "energy". When you move the jack handle down, say one foot while the car goes up 1/2 inch then, since "energy" is "distance times force", (1/2)F= (12)f so that f= (1/24)F. To get the same energy you need only apply 1/24 the force. There is a "conservation of energy" law but there is no "conservation of force".
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top