Is Inner Product of C[-1,2] & V Defined?

daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0
1) C[-1,2] is a space of all continues functions f: [-1,2] -> C (complex)
Is:
<f,g> = \int_{-1}^{2}|f(t) + g(t)|dt
an inner product of C[-1,2]?
I think that the answer is no because:
<f+g, h> \neq <f,h> + <g,h>
for some f and g. this can happen when all the functions are positive and so:
|f(t) + h(t) + g(t)| doesn't equal |f(t) + h(t)| + |g(t) + h(t)|

2)
V is a space of all real functions with defined double derivatives in the interval
[-\pi, \pi]
we define:
<f,g> = f(-\pi)g(-\pi) + \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f''(x)g''(x)dx
is <f,g> an inner product of V?
also here i think that the answer is no because <f,f> can equal zero even if all of f isn't 0, this can happen if f(-pi) is zero and the double derivative is 0 everywere (contiues slope).
am i correct?
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
2) there is nothing in the definition of inner product that means <f,f>=0 if and only if f=0.

Wht is the definition of an inner product? do these satisfy, or not satisfy the definitions?
 
matt grime said:
2) there is nothing in the definition of inner product that means <f,f>=0 if and only if f=0.

Isn't that the 3rd property of the inner product? look here for example:
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/InnerProduct.html

did i misunderstand something?

and is (1) correct?
Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, my mistake - I was thinking of a bilinear pairing, not an inner product.

So, you have the definitions, and the counter examples: what was the question?
 
Last edited:
I just wanted to make sure that my counter examples were correct.
Thanks
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top