Is it advisable to keep homework solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cordyceps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
AI Thread Summary
When self-studying physics, retaining your problem solutions is generally advisable, as they can serve as valuable references for future studies. The organization and clarity of your work are crucial; well-structured solutions with clear notes and comments enhance their usefulness. As physics concepts build on foundational principles, revisiting earlier problems can aid in understanding more complex topics. While it's common to discard solutions that are poorly organized or unhelpful, maintaining a personal archive of your work can provide insights and reinforce learning. Ultimately, keeping solutions until they can be revised or improved is beneficial for long-term comprehension.
cordyceps
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I'm self-studying physics by working through a bunch of problems. Should I keep the solutions I come up with or just trash them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
keep them.
 
It likely depends quite a fair bit about the organization of your work. It would, of course, be best to write clearly, make special notes about certain approaches, and make comments about the solution (check the units and why it the result makes sense). If you do these things, your solutions might be useful to look over later. If the solutions are a mess, keeping them is probably worthless.
 
I think it's worth it to keep your solutions. So much of physics builds on basic principles. The further you go, the more often you will need to refer back to the fundamentals as it is often necessary to refer back to the solution of a simpler problem to tackle a more complex one. And like Physics Girl PhD said, it's worth keeping good notes.
 
Keep them... until your redo/revise them.
Sometimes there's more than one way to do a problem...
So, it's nice to have a reference to look back on... especially since it's your own work.

I'll admit... after some time, I do toss out solutions that I wrote when I was a TA or instructor... especially if I didn't like the textbook that was used.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
400
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top