Programs Is It Bad to Earn All Degrees at the Same School?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neurocomp2003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bsc School
Click For Summary
Attending the same school for all three degrees is increasingly common but still viewed unfavorably by some employers, who believe it limits networking and diverse experiences. Many argue that changing schools enhances opportunities for collaboration and exposure to different ideas. Some participants noted that it can be easier to gain admission to graduate programs at the same institution due to established relationships with faculty. However, others shared experiences where schools were hesitant to hire their own graduates for advanced positions. Ultimately, while personal circumstances like family ties may influence the decision, diversifying educational experiences is generally seen as beneficial for career prospects.
  • #31
Well, I would never want to hire someone who made a career of the military..being a fellow Veternarian myself, I know them types. I would, however, not discriminate against someone based on where they were educated at. As far as I and the law are concerned, that is illegal.

In fact, your probably better off keeping your job hush-hush because
if your viewpoints on hiring people, whether they attended the same school for three degrees or not, finds its way to your employers could be grounds for termination.

Oh yeah...and if you give me some BS like..."my employers feel the same way I do and in fact we practice what we preach"..well then congratulations for finding people that are as ignorant and unethical as you are.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
buddyholly9999 said:
Well, I would never want to hire someone who made a career of the military..being a fellow Veternarian myself, I know them types.

What exactly are "them types" and why wouldn't you hire them?
I think this is a pretty broad and unfair generalization.

-GeoMike-
 
  • #33
join the marines and find out.
 
  • #34
Dr Transport said:
And what have I said that not credible?
Ok a veteran...

What is not credible is the "i cannot say where i work"-part. I assumed that to be quite obvious :rolleyes: .Besides, again, you donnot have to name any actual names. Just a field, or a description of your professional activities will do. If you say you cannot say this, well, that is the "not credible" part. You can be a brain surgeon that works for a top secret firm. Yet without tellin' us the actual name of clinic or institution you work for, you can reveal the fact that you perform surgery on human brains...You see my point ?


marlon
 
  • #35
buddyholly9999 said:
join the marines and find out.

You can avoid defending your own statement if you like, but don't pretend like I "just wouldn't understand".
If you're going to throw something out there that, without clarification, speaks badly about an entire group of people who have choosen a particular course in life (and a respectable one at that) you should be willing to back it up with more than "join the marines and find out". Especially since the Marines are not representative of all the other service branches.

And for the record, my father was a marine for 22 years. I know the life. And he's still working in the civilian sector almost 20 years later. He has been nothing but an asset to all the companies he has worked for.
As for myself, I choose a different route - serving in the Air Force for 6 years before deciding career military wasn't for me.
There's a world of difference between the two branches (which is why I thing your generalization is fairly broad and unfair), but a fail to see any overarching flaw or trait that makes career military people unsuitable or undesirable for civilian sector employees.

Thank you,
-GeoMike-
 
  • #36
Yeah...and letting some guy get away with saying that just because you go the same school for your post high school education career makes you less of a candidate for a job...

Oh the irony...
 
  • #37
marlon said:
Just a field, or a description of your professional activities will do. ...You see my point ?marlon

Optical measurements...how about that...

But I still do not see your point. Again, I still do not see how this is pertinent to the original question posed here about getting all of your degrees from the same institution.

Because I said that I would not divulge my employer, where or what should have been of no consequnce to this thread. If you wish to give that information, good for you, I cannot to because it is my employers policy. Now someday you will get out of school and get a job, if your employer asks you to do the same will you comply? If your position depended on it, I would suspect that you would because the almighty $$ is more important to your continued survival than your ego. In my chosen line of work your if you are asked to leave a firm or outright removed, the chances of ever working that field have dropped into the "nil" category because all of our competitors out there have very similar policies., i.e. you're going to spend a lot of time finding a job in a different field and pretty much be black listed in your former field.
 
  • #38
buddyholly9999 said:
Well, I would never want to hire someone who made a career of the military..being a fellow Veternarian myself, I know them types. I would, however, not discriminate against someone based on where they were educated at. As far as I and the law are concerned, that is illegal.

In fact, your probably better off keeping your job hush-hush because
if your viewpoints on hiring people, whether they attended the same school for three degrees or not, finds its way to your employers could be grounds for termination.

Oh yeah...and if you give me some BS like..."my employers feel the same way I do and in fact we practice what we preach"..well then congratulations for finding people that are as ignorant and unethical as you are.

You start the thread by saying you wouldn't hire someone from the military, but you end the post saying he's ignorant and unethical.

That has to be the dumbest post I've read on PF in the 2 and half years I've been here.
 
  • #39
I'm somewhat confused, are we talking about military veterinarians? That doesn't sound like a broad category.
 
  • #40
JasonRox said:
You start the thread by saying you wouldn't hire someone from the military, but you end the post saying he's ignorant and unethical.

That has to be the dumbest post I've read on PF in the 2 and half years I've been here.

Have you read my posts?
 
  • #41
Rach3 said:
I'm somewhat confused, are we talking about military veterinarians? That doesn't sound like a broad category.


No, no, no, this has nothing to do with the veterinarian occupation. Transport commented that he was a former vet, as in veteran, as in someone who's served in the armed forces. As for the previous comment about not hiring someone from the military...I'm speechless. I can tell you that some of the most intelligent people I've ever met have had military careers. The technological know-how of Air Force and Navy personnel alone surpasses what a lot of tenured professors ever dream of. I'm willing to bet you that someone with a combined physics and military background has potential employers in the private sector practically creaming their pants. The military gets the best toys and the best budget for the best research, for military personnel and civilian contractors. While I'm like most of the people here and wish for that research to be used primarily for the betterment of society instead of the immediate needs of defense, the two aren't mutually exclusive.
 
  • #42
cyrusabdollahi said:
Have you read my posts?

Nah, I just skip by them. :-p
 
  • #43
Hey, Rox, bet I'm more of an alpha male than you are...how's that for the dumbest post you ever saw on PF? ;)
 
  • #44
buddyholly9999 said:
Well, I would never want to hire someone who made a career of the military..being a fellow Veternarian myself, I know them types.

Is this a joke? Seriously, I'm having a hard time telling.

buddyholly9999 said:
I would, however, not discriminate against someone based on where they were educated at. As far as I and the law are concerned, that is illegal.

So you think (at least partly) basing a hiring decision on where someone was educated is illegal? Where exactly is this illegal?
 
  • #45
ballistikk said:
As for the previous comment about not hiring someone from the military...

No where did I ever mention that...

Another clarification, I never said that it was corporate policy to not hire or consider hiring people who have all their degrees i.e. Bs through PhD from the same institution.

BuddyHolly9999 said:
I would, however, not discriminate against someone based on where they were educated at. As far as I and the law are concerned, that is illegal.

The burden of proof is with the person who claims to have been wronged. If you happen to not get hired by a firm and you percieve that it was because of getting all of your degrees from one institution, unless you have some really good proof, your claims won't get too far.

You can whine all you want, but in the end that is all your going to be able to do, All the employer has to do is say is that you do not meet their complete qualifications or you were not a good fit for the position. Believe me, there are companies who will not hire graduates of certain schools, I have seen it and have been told it.

Lets say that you wrote a top notch dissertation in some area that a company really want to work in or is working in and just happened to be at one school for 10 years getting all your degrees, but your character is lacking, hypothetically you are a habitual drug user or have been picked up on DUI or any other type of misdemeanor, when they do a background or police check on you, you most likely will not get an offer. Most employers will not hire people with misdemenors in their past and a felony is a no no.
 
  • #46
buddyholly9999 said:
Hey, Rox, bet I'm more of an alpha male than you are...how's that for the dumbest post you ever saw on PF? ;)


You clearly don't read much yomamma.
 
  • #47
Doc, I still have not heard from you as to why you frown upon all 3 from the same institution? What is wrong with that?
 
  • #48
United States of America..

http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/qanda.html

and for those of you to lazy...

Discriminatory practices under these [federal] laws also include:

employment decisions based on stereotypes or assumptions about the abilities, traits, or performance of individuals of a certain sex, race, age, religion, or ethnic group, or individuals with disabilities; and



All it takes is one person...

yup...shmoe..things shouldn't be so serious sometimes..
 
  • #49
cyrusabdollahi said:
Doc, I still have not heard from you as to why you frown upon all 3 from the same institution? What is wrong with that?

I have found that people who get all of their advanced education from one institution tend to have blinders on.
 
  • #50
In what respect?
 
  • #51
buddyholly9999 said:
Discriminatory practices under these [federal] laws also include:

employment decisions based on stereotypes or assumptions about the abilities, traits, or performance of individuals of a certain sex, race, age, religion, or ethnic group, or individuals with disabilities; and

No where does it say institutions of higher education. Ther are plenty of places who will not hire from certain colleges because of past experience with their graduates. If a position calls for a degree from an ABET Accredited institution, if your school is not, "tough luck Charlie", you are not getting hired.

I will add this, I know some very intelligent people who went to the University of Rochester for undergraduate degrees in Optics. When they applied to UofR for graduate work they were told not to bother, it was a waste of time and money, they were not getting in.
 
Last edited:
  • #52
cyrusabdollahi said:
In what respect?

They have only one view of things in their degree program, other departments give you a fresh vantage point to make decisions.
 
  • #53
Well, I plan on doing the first two at the same place. As for Phd, <shudder> not so sure if I will do one at all. :smile:
 
  • #54
cyrusabdollahi said:
You're not allowed to tell where you work? That's odd...

unless he works for DoD
 
  • #55
buddyholly9999 said:
United States of America..

http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/qanda.html

and for those of you to lazy...

Discriminatory practices under these [federal] laws also include:

employment decisions based on stereotypes or assumptions about the abilities, traits, or performance of individuals of a certain sex, race, age, religion, or ethnic group, or individuals with disabilities; and

I'm lazy. Please point out where it says they can't base employment decisions on where someone received their degree(s) because I don't see it on the list you've quoted.
 
  • #56
Pythagorean said:
unless he works for DoD

He said Industry, that would be the government.
 
  • #57
cyrusabdollahi said:
He said Industry, that would be the government.

oh :blushing:
 
  • #58
Dr Transport said:
Optical measurements...how about that...
Well, it's a start.

But I still do not see your point. Again, I still do not see how this is pertinent to the original question posed here about getting all of your degrees from the same institution.

Well, i was not reacting towards the original question. I was asking YOU about the fact why YOU cannot reveal your employer's name or the name of the company you work for. If all you do is optical measurements (which are, at least last time i checked, not revolutionary or harmful for the world) then why is your boss NOT allowing you to reveal the company's name. Now, don't just say, "it is our policy". You are entitled to ask questions, right ? So, surely, you must know why you cannot say that name ? Please tell me that. It might make things more clearer.

Finally, i work in a research institute where there is a non disclosure policy on the results that are acquired. Each of our groups has private meetings and this is a privacy that i respect. But that does NOT make it impossible for me to tell YOU where i work : IMEC. Don't just say : ohh, one day you will get oyut of school and ...There is no reason to treat me like a child, thankyouverymuch. I ain't stupid, you know...

marlon
 
  • #59
marlon said:
So, surely, you must know why you cannot say that name ? Please tell me that. It might make things more clearer.
marlon

The reason is competative advantage...If your competitors don't know you are doing something, they cannot get into the game and get ahead of you in securing external funding.

A nondisclosure policy is very different from a policy that requires denial that something exists...Anyone that does not work in that world does not understand it. Our restrictions limit our searches on the internet because if someone traced our usage and search records they may be able to reverse engineer what we are working on.
 
  • #60
Dr Transport said:
A nondisclosure policy is very different from a policy that requires denial that something exists...Anyone that does not work in that world does not understand it. Our restrictions limit our searches on the internet because if someone traced our usage and search records they may be able to reverse engineer what we are working on.
Yet you're allowed to post on a public message board?!?

Any admin could go to these boards controls and see where you're posting from - if not your exact computer, they would see your gateway, leading to your organisation...

Or is it soooooo secret, they rerout you through ''Bob's Hardware Supplies'' :wink: :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K