Is it normal to forget most previously learned material?

[PhizKid]

Every semester, whenever I begin to learn a new subject, that is, a more advanced class of the previous subject (i.e. algebra -> pre-calc -> calc -> diff eq, etc.) I forget a lot of the stuff I learned in the previous class when I'm learning the new content and constantly have to review all the time because I keep forgetting the basics and it's interfering with the more advanced classes...is this normal or should I hammer the bases more into my head so I will never forget them and not have to look back every time I need a formula or theorem and whatnot?

 

[monmon_4]

... should I hammer the bases more into my head so I will never forget them and not have to look back every time I need a formula or theorem and whatnot?

If you have the time and a real interest in the material, yes. Forgetting material is also an indication that it was not learned well in the first place. Usually when I learn something well, it becomes second nature.

 

[Mépris]

This happens a lot more with physics than with math but that is largely because the math *I'm* doing (for the time being) is usually more geared towards problem solving, whereas those in physics (even simple, algebra-based physics) involve the description of physical systems and understanding (and also remembering) various laws and such.

What happens is that I may forget how something in a physics topic works, say, the motion of a particle down a slope. However, if I were to take a few minutes to review everything, I would be able to solve the problems. Perhaps, as the previous poster has noted, you have not *thoroughly* learned the material before. Studying doesn't have to be hard. Try a few problems on every different chapter every day or so (also: they're interlinked, you'll see high school algebra everywhere, pre-calculus in calculus, calc in DEs and so forth) and see if you notice any changes.

You have to stay in touch to remember. I guess that with some subjects, it's more like walking or cycling (you don't easily forget those) than the others.

 

[mathwonk]

It does seem common to forget most of each course. At least that was the case for most of my students for 30+ years in university classes. I eventually learned to teach essentially every class from scratch, as if the students remembered virtually nothing from previous courses. Even when teaching graduate PhD candidates, I always had to review the two most basic theorems of advanced calculus, the implicit function theorem and Green's theorem.

This always puzzled me because I had not forgotten myself essentially anything I had learned in high school math classes for my whole life. I had participated in math contests regularly, stayed after school to practice for them, and probably benefited from that extra practice at learning reinforcing and using the material.

But I am convinced my students' forgetting showed that many of them never really learned the material well at all. Basic study habits such as reviewing the material every day after class, would have made impossible the sort of situations I faced every day. Other students made it clear to me that they never studied at all on weekends, regarding them as purely for social activities.

Office hours were routinely ignored, no questions asked in class, and questions were never raised until the day before, sometimes hours or literally minutes before a test.

Some students seemed to think that the prerequisite for a class was simply to have taken the previous class even getting a D in it, rather than to have learned and retained the prerequisite material. You would think it obvious that if algebra is a prerequisite for calculus, and a student has forgotten all his algebra, that he would realize he does not have the prerequisite, and that he would review algebra in the summer perhaps before taking calculus. However this seemed uncommon behavior.

Perhaps some of my students, certainly not all, thought that the only purpose in taking courses was to get a degree, rather than to learn what was taught in the courses. Perhaps some thought that a degree, rather than knowledge, was the key to a good job. Some students focus entirely on passing the class rather than learning the subject. For this reason some seek out the easiest teacher,f rom whom they will learn least, rather than the most demanding teacher, who will push them the furthest.

This may be partly the fault of those of us who teach without giving any indication of how the material we teach will be used. If we tell students why they need to know something, maybe it will help. [this has been edited.]

By the way, the fact that you are asking this question shows that you are motivated to improve your study skills. More power to you.

 

[Mépris]

Basic study habits such as reviewing the material every day after class, would have made impossible the sort of situations I faced every day.

OP, by any chance, have you attempted such a method? Throughout most of high school, I coasted through my courses simply by turning up and paying attention to my classes. It was a bad idea but I had then, very little interest in what I was doing and simply found my classes as either "dull" or "kinda cool" and not "out of this world insane!
I'll keep doing this until I fall asleep out of fatigue!". When I started learning more complex material, be it mathematics or literature, I found that just "turning up" was never enough. Around that time, I had begun to develop a deeper interest in my work and now, it's come to a point that I regularly review what I've learned.

It is also helpful to note that this method is not "boring" or "insanely hard". At least, it isn't for me and it seems to work! Really, it's just a matter of sitting down for at least one solid hour (YMMV, depending on how well you grasped the subject...) to read and make sense of/understand the theory and then working out a few exercises. You don't have to do one hour's work in one go. Breaking it down into 20-minute chunks is fine, as long as you pick up where you left off shortly after. What is key is finding something that works for you!

This may be partly the fault of those of us who teach without giving any indication of how the material we teach will be used. I know some teachers who learned to essentially force their students to work by assigning difficult homework regularly for credit, to motivate the students to attend office hours purposely to get help on the homework. I never liked being a personal trainer of this type, preferring to expect my students to develop the maturity to do their own work. This worked well with motivated classes like grad students, optional topics, and honors classes, but did not work well in general for most non honors required classes.

This brings us to another interesting question: "how does one form an interest?". If one* can figure out how that works, then stimulating an interest in a subject (even if just for the duration of a course) becomes possible.

*Whether one is someone teaching a course to an uninterested group of individuals or one who has to learn something they are not interested in.

 

[mathwonk]

I also thought just showing up, if I did even that, was enough. I flunked out of college after a while with this approach and when I got back, without any review of prerequisite material, started off with a D on the first test in the next class. Faced with getting kicked out again, and this time for good, I began reviewing the lecture every day for one hour after class in the library. Then I also bought a practice book, a Schaum's outline, and did extra work. Finally I began looking up in other books, material to fill gaps in the class presentation. On the final, I got 100, not the only one, but the prof said it was "head and shoulders above the rest of the class".

 

[Skrew]

There are two issues.

1. How was the material taught?

Proof classes always allow me to remmember things much easier, if it's a formula based class I generally forget right away. Learning how it was mentally derived makes things easier to remmember.

2. How much information were you having to take in that term?

If you're taking 4+ difficult classes, most people won't remmember much of anything, they are too busy trying to cram everything and don't have time to really think about what's being covered.

 

[PhizKid]

In high school, paying attention in class was just enough for me to maintain grades in the 90s, which I was content with. It didn't start cutting it later on though, and the same thing that happened to you guys also happened to me.

Anyway, how I usually study now is I kind of break up the study material by the description of the syllabus and when exams take place. I will study right after class and throughout the week, continuously reviewing all relevant material until the point of the test, then never study that stuff again because I begin to focus on the next exam. And then for the end of semester exams, I will just compress the entire study load into a shorter period of time but by then it won't have been long enough for me to entirely forget what I learned for the entire semester.

The forgetting happens typically after an extended hiatus such as summer break and when I start taking new classes...by the time it comes for the semester after that, I will have probably forgotten everything I learned two semesters ago.

 

[gravenewworld]

I forgot most of the math I learned, and I used to be really good at it. If you don't use it, you lose it unless you are gifted with a photographic memory. I mean I understand the important concepts still, like what is a derivative, what is an integral, etc. but if I had to do an integration by parts right now, I probably couldn't do it since I haven't done it in about 10 years. The important thing is just to be able to recognize what the problem is at hand and where to go to look up how to solve it. If I did a few problems to refresh my memory, I could probably get back into the groove of things.

 

[member 392791]

I think I remember reading that you only retain something like 1% of what you learn

 

[Nano-Passion]

Well it depends on what your forgetting. If you forget something like the derivative of x, then you have to question your knowledge of the material because it is supposed to be very intuitive.

 

[I_noscopedJFK]

I think I remember reading that you only retain something like 1% of what you learn

That's a bit misleading when you consider all of the different information that you experience throughout a day; maybe you read the nutritional info on the back of a cereal box when eating breakfast because you were bored - of course you're not going to remember insignificant things like that... but studying for a test - that's most likely going to stay in your long-term memory

 

[member 392791]

Not for me, I got a 100 on a math test, and within a week I had no idea how to do anything.

 

[I_noscopedJFK]

lol you're right

 

[MathematicalPhysicist]

It does seem common to forget most of each course. At least that was the case for most of my students for 30+ years in university classes. I eventually learned to teach essentially every class from scratch, as if the students remembered virtually nothing from previous courses. Even when teaching graduate PhD candidates, I always had to review the two most basic theorems of advanced calculus, the implicit function theorem and Green's theorem.

This always puzzled me because I had not forgotten myself essentially anything I had learned in high school math classes for my whole life. I had participated in math contests regularly, stayed after school to practice for them, and probably benefited from that extra practice at learning reinforcing and using the material.

But I am convinced my students' forgetting showed that many of them never really learned the material well at all. Basic study habits such as reviewing the material every day after class, would have made impossible the sort of situations I faced every day. Other students made it clear to me that they never studied at all on weekends, regarding them as purely for social activities.

Office hours were routinely ignored, no questions asked in class, and questions were never raised until the day before, sometimes hours or literally minutes before a test.

Some students seemed to think that the prerequisite for a class was simply to have taken the previous class even getting a D in it, rather than to have learned and retained the prerequisite material. You would think it obvious that if algebra is a prerequisite for calculus, and a student has forgotten all his algebra, that he would realize he does not have the prerequisite, and that he would review algebra in the summer perhaps before taking calculus. However this seemed uncommon behavior.

Perhaps some of my students, certainly not all, thought that the only purpose in taking courses was to get a degree, rather than to learn what was taught in the courses. Perhaps some thought that a degree, rather than knowledge, was the key to a good job. Some students focus entirely on passing the class rather than learning the subject. For this reason some seek out the easiest teacher,f rom whom they will learn least, rather than the most demanding teacher, who will push them the furthest.

This may be partly the fault of those of us who teach without giving any indication of how the material we teach will be used. If we tell students why they need to know something, maybe it will help. [this has been edited.]

By the way, the fact that you are asking this question shows that you are motivated to improve your study skills. More power to you.

I understand your students opting to save weekends for socializing, wish I had done it...

 

[Jorriss]

Not for me, I got a 100 on a math test, and within a week I had no idea how to do anything.

Then you had an incredibly flimsy understanding to start with and/or the exams were incredibly easy.

 

[member 392791]

Then you had an incredibly flimsy understanding to start with and/or the exams were incredibly easy.

Oh no, I just have old people's tests and I memorize whatever they did on their test and do it on my own (the questions are similar enough semester to semester that I can figure it out most of the time and always get 95%+ on the tests). yes I know it's incredibly flimsy, but I'm going into the final with a 99% so all I need is a 56% on the final to keep my A

 

[mathwonk]

you are wasting your (and professors') time and your (parents') money. you seem to have perfected a system for sailing though school with no residual knowledge at all.

I am afraid you are going to be a very sad young person when you find out afterwards that not knowing anything at all means you are unqualified for any employment whatsoever. yes even with a "degree".

 

[Nabeshin]

Oh no, I just have old people's tests and I memorize whatever they did on their test and do it on my own (the questions are similar enough semester to semester that I can figure it out most of the time and always get 95%+ on the tests). yes I know it's incredibly flimsy, but I'm going into the final with a 99% so all I need is a 56% on the final to keep my A

Why are you even at university?

 

[member 392791]

I blame the education system being so rote. Maybe if they tested concepts instead of memorizing cookbook steps to answering anything my ploys wouldn't work. I am the first to admit I have no idea what Green's theorem is, but I did it on my final today and computed it correctly, all I did was follow the steps as done on previous quizzes. Easiest A in my life

oh yeah, and stop putting so much pressure on me to get all A's and maybe I wouldn't cheat the system. Professional school's emphasize A's a lot more than understanding the concept, so I'm just doing what I got to do to get a secure high paying job.

Don't blame me.

And i'll be doing the same exact thing next semester in differential equations

 

[AlephZero]

Not for me, I got a 100 on a math test, and within a week I had no idea how to do anything.

This is consistent with my hypothesis that the main cause of this is "continuous assessment" testing.

Back in the day when I was at university, there were NO marked homework tests, NO mid term exams, etc. You were assessed on the full year's work by spending 6 hours a day in an exam room on several consecutive days (no "rest days" included).

Surprising as it might seem, back then nobody complained this was "too hard", "unfair", or "didn't cater for their assorted learning disorders". If you wanted a degree, you knew what you had to do - end of story. Every undergrad had been used to this testing system at school from age 11. If you couldn't handle it, you wouldn't have got to university at all.

 

[Jorriss]

oh yeah, and stop putting so much pressure on me to get all A's and maybe I wouldn't cheat the system. Professional school's emphasize A's a lot more than understanding the concept, so I'm just doing what I got to do to get a secure high paying job.

What type of graduate school do you want? For physics, chem and bio, that is not true.

 

[member 392791]

What type of graduate school do you want? For physics, chem and bio, that is not true.

law school or medical school, I already counted out doing science because I know I don't understand the concepts well enough to pursue scientific endeavors...also, the pay sucks.

with my mentality, you'll probably see me on the presidential election ballot in about 15-20 years. scary thought huh?

 

[Jorriss]

law school or medical school, I already counted out doing science because I know I don't understand the concepts well enough to pursue scientific endeavors...also, the pay sucks.

Ahh, well, unfortunately for people, medical school admissions are pretty much a joke that cater to people who do the minimum at learning but the max at attaining grades.

 

[member 392791]

Ahh, well, unfortunately for people, medical school admissions are pretty much a joke that cater to people who do the minimum at learning but the max at attaining grades.

sums up my situation entirely

 

[turbo]

Every semester, whenever I begin to learn a new subject, that is, a more advanced class of the previous subject (i.e. algebra -> pre-calc -> calc -> diff eq, etc.) I forget a lot of the stuff I learned in the previous class when I'm learning the new content and constantly have to review all the time because I keep forgetting the basics and it's interfering with the more advanced classes...is this normal or should I hammer the bases more into my head so I will never forget them and not have to look back every time I need a formula or theorem and whatnot?

Learning math is cumulative, so it is not helpful to blank out previous materials. Sometimes, it seems that students want to learn to pass the "next test" and I don't think that is a good approach. Whenever you take more advanced courses, it would be a good idea to review previous concepts because they all build on one another. It's time-consuming, but it's probably more beneficial to you in the long run. Just my opinion, and I have been out of college for 40+ years, but the cumulative basics for math studies probably haven't changed much since then. Good luck.

 

[Jorriss]

sums up my situation entirely

That doesn't mean it's advisable.

1) What if you don't get into medical school?
2) Don't you want to learn for your own sake?

 

[mathwonk]

this reminds me of a brief conversation i had years ago with a business student who thought his degree guaranteed a job. next time i saw him was when i went into wendy's for a burger.

 

[member 392791]

Yes I would like to learn, but there's no way I'm going to master physics, chemistry, and calculus simultaneously in such a short time span. How am I supposed to understand Newton's work in 3 weeks, when it took him probably 10+ years to formulate his laws, and he was one of the smartest people who ever lived? It turns out grades don't reflect knowledge. There is simply too much damn information being thrown at me in too short of a time span, and unless I want to spend 8 hours studying everyday I won't be able to understand it. I want to have a life too and enjoy free time instead of always having my nose in a book. I'm just not damn smart enough, so I got to figure out another way, and it seems like I did.

I have a friend who is such a try hard, she will work like no other to learn the concepts and gets A's in all her coursework. I on the other hand follow the work smarter, not harder principle. While she at the end of the day understands the concepts at much deeper level than me, the outcome for both of us is the A on some transcript in some file in some cabinet somewhere in the world.

She will be very successful one day (electrical engineer), and if I keep up what I'm doing and it keeps working, I will be a lawyer or doctor one day. We will be fine financially, only difference is I put in 1/10th the effort and still get 2-3 times the pay. My way is more efficient.

To Mathwonk,
The difference between me and that business student is that the business student wasn't doing a real major. Also, you previously said you teach everything like it was the student's first time, sounds like you would expect this kind of behavior. If I become some job that demands high wage I won't have wasted my parents money, and as of right now I've managed to deceive my teachers into thinking I am bright and that my scores reflect my knowledge. They love me!

Not to mention I swear teachers intentionally withold information from students that would be critical for them to answer problems, just so they can struggle more. My way around this is wikipedia, turns out wikipedia > professor for explaining essentially anything.

 

[Nano-Passion]

law school or medical school, I already counted out doing science because I know I don't understand the concepts well enough to pursue scientific endeavors...also, the pay sucks.

with my mentality, you'll probably see me on the presidential election ballot in about 15-20 years. scary thought huh?

I'm not so convinced. With your mentality I envision you on the unemployment line and voting for the president who supports food stamps.

Yes I would like to learn, but there's no way I'm going to master physics, chemistry, and calculus simultaneously in such a short time span. How am I supposed to understand Newton's work in 3 weeks, when it took him probably 10+ years to formulate his laws, and he was one of the smartest people who ever lived? It turns out grades don't reflect knowledge. There is simply too much damn information being thrown at me in too short of a time span, and unless I want to spend 8 hours studying everyday I won't be able to understand it. I want to have a life too and enjoy free time instead of always having my nose in a book. I'm just not damn smart enough, so I got to figure out another way, and it seems like I did.

I have a friend who is such a try hard, she will work like no other to learn the concepts and gets A's in all her coursework. I on the other hand follow the work smarter, not harder principle. While she at the end of the day understands the concepts at much deeper level than me, the outcome for both of us is the A on some transcript in some file in some cabinet somewhere in the world.

She will be very successful one day (electrical engineer), and if I keep up what I'm doing and it keeps working, I will be a lawyer or doctor one day. We will be fine financially, only difference is I put in 1/10th the effort and still get 2-3 times the pay. My way is more efficient.

To Mathwonk,
The difference between me and that business student is that the business student wasn't doing a real major

Not to mention I swear teachers intentionally withold information from students that would be critical for them to answer problems, just so they can struggle more. My way around this is wikipedia, turns out wikipedia > professor for explaining essentially anything.

Your elitism is frightening. And your philosophy of learning and knowledge is grossly misplaced. It doesn't take a genius to study what Newton helped to create. And we don't need 10 years to learn the concept of a derivative. That is a faulty generalization.

I on the other hand follow the work smarter, not harder principle.

I believe you mean that you work less while she works smarter? She goes for deep understanding and you go for cheating. I wonder who works smarter? And I also wonder who will function better with their degree.

 

[member 392791]

My method is not cheating in any way, shape, or form. And once again I said I'm not smart enough to understand all the material in a deep enough manner in a short time frame and be able to live with sanity

 

[Jorriss]

My method is not cheating in any way, shape, or form. And once again I said I'm not smart enough to understand all the material in a deep enough manner in a short time frame and be able to live with sanity

Actually, I know from experience, that there is a good chance what you are doing is cheating. Schools do not allow students to obtain copies of old exams without the instructors approval.

 

[member 392791]

Actually, I know from experience, that there is a good chance what you are doing is cheating. Schools do not allow students to obtain copies of old exams without the instructors approval.

The teacher's give the student's back the tests. These are not tests that the teacher takes back and you don't get to see ever again. I just know how to make friends with older people than me and get them to give me all their old tests and labs. I'm already set up with tests and labs for chemistry II and tommorow will be set up with tests for linear algebra/DE

 

[Nabeshin]

How am I supposed to understand Newton's work in 3 weeks, when it took him probably 10+ years to formulate his laws, and he was one of the smartest people who ever lived?

We've also had 300+ years of experience teaching this material and reformulating it in a way which is easy to understand and master. The same goes for basically anything in the undergraduate physics curriculum.

 

[Nano-Passion]

I blame the education system being so rote. Maybe if they tested concepts instead of memorizing cookbook steps to answering anything my ploys wouldn't work. I am the first to admit I have no idea what Green's theorem is, but I did it on my final today and computed it correctly, all I did was follow the steps as done on previous quizzes. Easiest A in my life

oh yeah, and stop putting so much pressure on me to get all A's and maybe I wouldn't cheat the system. Professional school's emphasize A's a lot more than understanding the concept, so I'm just doing what I got to do to get a secure high paying job.

Don't blame me.

And i'll be doing the same exact thing next semester in differential equations

I don't understand, for things requiring more logical thinking and conceptualization, you say that the education system is stupid because it requires you to learn something in a day that took others years. And for things that require knowledge of a various pool of things, you say that they expect too much rote memorization. Maybe school just isn't for you. Maybe your not doing what you love and, having a bad time as a consequence--so you blame everything for it.

 

[Tosh5457]

Every semester, whenever I begin to learn a new subject, that is, a more advanced class of the previous subject (i.e. algebra -> pre-calc -> calc -> diff eq, etc.) I forget a lot of the stuff I learned in the previous class when I'm learning the new content and constantly have to review all the time because I keep forgetting the basics and it's interfering with the more advanced classes...is this normal or should I hammer the bases more into my head so I will never forget them and not have to look back every time I need a formula or theorem and whatnot?

Hmm I usually remember at least the most important things, but some things I forget and I have to give a quick review. I think you should pay more attention to the bases (for example in multivariate calculus: chain rule, stokes theorem, gauss theorem; in linear algebra: vector space, basis of a vector space, eigenvalues and eigenvectors, homogeneous system and determinant).

 

[Nano-Passion]

My method is not cheating in any way, shape, or form. And once again I said I'm not smart enough to understand all the material in a deep enough manner in a short time frame and be able to live with sanity

Your not smart enough is different from your not dedicated enough. The first is a victim statement and a very passive philosophy-- I loathe it. The latter blames oneself for not trying hard enough. Which philosophy do you choose to be under? One thing for sure, if you choose to fall under the philosophy that you aren't smart enough, then you will never reach your potential.

I thought algebra was hard and didn't make any sense two years ago. Now I'm studying differential equations in my spare time. I could have went two routes: either I wasn't smart enough, or I wasn't dedicated enough.

You choose.

 

[member 392791]

Yeah you have a point I hate what I'm doing, but I'm getting the marks and I just want a high paying job. If I followed what I really liked I would be making $30,000 a year, and that is just not reasonable. I'm also not dedicated enough, I've repeatedly said I refuse to study 8 hours a day to meet the expectations. Maybe for some people it takes less time, but for me there is no way.

 

[Jorriss]

The teacher's give the student's back the tests. These are not tests that the teacher takes back and you don't get to see ever again. I just know how to make friends with older people than me and get them to give me all their old tests and labs. I'm already set up with tests and labs for chemistry II and tommorow will be set up with tests for linear algebra/DE

I figured the teacher gives them back. Its still considered cheating. Personally, I don't care, but it is cheating at many, many institutions.

 

[Mholnic-]

Woopy, I took a look at some of your other posts. You're clearly having a hard time picking a major and further you state that you never really had an interest in medicine, you're bored in your math/physics classes and with the finer details of biology. You prefer the macroscopic to the microscopic, animal behavior to molecules and you're already talking about burnout.

Why, then, become a doctor? The money? I don't see any other reason. Think about this, though -- how do you intend to get through Chem II, OChem I & II and Biology with that mindset? How will you not burn out if you're taking subjects you hate... biochem, microbiology, immunology, genetics, etc? And that's just your undergrad career. You'd still need to get into medical school (good luck acing the MCAT if you've forgotten everything a week after each final) and THROUGH medical school. That means more classes about subjects you hate and can't be bothered to remember.

Even if you do make it into/through med school and into an internship and residency.. how will you hide your flagrant ignorance when they tell you to do something and you don't have a friend there to give you the answers? Like you said you've deceived your teachers into thinking you're smart, you've tricked them into thinking you know what you're talking about -- but more than that you've deceived yourself.

You've convinced yourself that you'll get some dream job where people will pay you 2-3 times as much as they pay everyone else.. for what? Think about it. What are they paying you for? They're paying you for knowledge, a skill-set, abilities that other people don't have. If being or becoming a doctor was easy, everyone would do it.. and a lot of people try. Compare the number of hopeful, save-the-world and buy-the-lexus "premeds" to the number of people entering good med schools with 4.0 science GPAs (rather than 4.0 English) to the number leaving med school with equally impressive resumes.

Most wash out. While you're at it, read up on some of the recent news stories surrounding the realities of law school.. the fact that people are entering with dreams and leaving with debt. They're being told that lawyer = money, they're NOT being told that this is only true for the best students at the best schools who know the best people. Read up on the classes required for EE and you'll see why your friend studies so hard to get those As.

Do the research, understand that things get harder and if you're not willing to put in the hours (as you've clearly stated you want to give up after 10 minutes of studying) you will not make it. Doing what you dream and making $30,000 is better than failing out of med school with a few hundred thousand in debt. Alternatively you could get your **** together, realize that money doesn't come easy and put in the time to study.

 

[member 392791]

you make it sound like I'm struggling. I have nearly a 4.0 GPA in a science major, I just absolutely hate it. The jobs are in science. Also, I know I'm not the only one doing this. You expect me to believe the entire country of India and China have an intense interest in medicine or engineering? There is absolutely no way.

If I loved the subject, I could study all those hours with no problem. She loves science, I don't. Just because I don't love a subject that earns a lot of money doesn't mean I'm not going to live poor the rest of my life. Good snide remark to the english majors that truly love whatever it is their doing, you should be encouraging me to network even more

 

[Mholnic-]

I don't mean to imply that you're struggling, only that in time you will with your attitude. In a previous thread (March 15) you spoke of burnout, of switching subjects after 10 minutes and of being in Physics I/Chem I, meaning you have another semester of Physics, another semester of general Chemistry and 2 semesters of Organic Chemistry ahead of you.. in addition to the rest of the Biology classes needed for a degree. Immunology, Microbiology, Biochemistry, A&P, etc.

I don't believe you'll make it through them without quitting with your currentmindset and your developing study habits. Interestingly enough this ties in with your comment on foreigners in science programs; their interest isn't necessary, but they possesses the work ethic required to master the material. You seem to think it's not necessary, and it'll bite you in the *** in time. Which is essentially what everyone else has been saying.

Intellect alone won't get you very far, you need determination and work ethic as well; hell, with enough of the latter two you don't even need to be all that smart. Interest is preferable but.. well, as you pointed out it's not required. The problem is that your willingness to work (study) seems to be faltering almost as quickly as your interest is. Unless that changes, you'll be changing your major again. Imho.

Edit: My remark about English majors was in reference to the aspiring doctors that major in something easy to keep their GPA high after they realize that it's not as easy as they thought to maintain a 4.0 through science courses and labs designed to weed out those who aren't willing to put in the requisite study time. Courses that, by the sound of it, you haven't started yet. Calc III is great, but you still have lots of Chem/Bio left.

 

[member 392791]

I already know I'm a ticking timebomb, but I feel like I'm in a hopeless situation between being miserable in my studies or being miserable being poor. Which misery would you choose? one is temporary and the other lasts a lifetime

 

[gravenewworld]

Hate biology? Just wait until medical school level human anatomy, cell biology, genetics, and biochemistry.

 

[some_letters]

I'm not so convinced. With your mentality I envision you on the unemployment line and voting for the president who supports food stamps.

Can someone please explain to me what is so wrong with foodstamps?! I've always been under the impression that they help save lives.

edit: This has nothing to do with the thread. perhaps a pm would be more appropriate.

 

[M83]

or being miserable being poor.

Money is not the be-all, end-all of your life. If that's your only motivation for being in college then you're most likely going to quit and end up working at a low rate job paying off your debt. If you hate academia so much, but want to be rich then why not become a businessman? You seem to be doing it the hard way as far as making a lot of money is concerned.

EDIT: I'm sure a lot of people will attest to this on this forum, but being in college full-time is like having a full-time job.

 

[Nano-Passion]

Can someone please explain to me what is so wrong with foodstamps?! I've always been under the impression that they help save lives.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with them. You misinterpreted. What I was saying is that he isn't going to be the next president but will either be unemployed or on welfare.

 

[some_letters]

There is absolutely nothing wrong with them. You misinterpreted. What I was saying is that he isn't going to be the next president but will either be unemployed or on welfare.

And then in the next post went on to call him an elitist. Chill out, man

 

[some_letters]

Money is not the be-all, end-all of your life. If that's your only motivation for being in college then you're most likely going to quit and end up working at a low rate job paying off your debt. If you hate academia so much, but want to be rich then why not become a businessman? You seem to be doing it the hard way as far as making a lot of money is concerned.

EDIT: I'm sure a lot of people will attest to this on this forum, but being in college full-time is like having a full-time job.

I agree with this. You seem to have a knack for networking already, why not major in something along those lines?

 

[Mholnic-]

I already know I'm a ticking timebomb, but I feel like I'm in a hopeless situation between being miserable in my studies or being miserable being poor. Which misery would you choose? one is temporary and the other lasts a lifetime

That's sort of our point. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your argument(s), but from where I'm sitting it seems as if you're... well, perhaps not arguing in favor of poor study habits in general but at the very least defending your study habits specifically. I don't mean to suggest that you have to switch majors, only that you change those habits lest you be forced to switch when your disinterest catches up with you in the next few semesters/years of chemistry and biology.

Some part of me would love to be majoring in languages or philosophy, but I chose the more difficult of my many and varied interests... physics. Not the most profitable, if that were the case I'd have gone with engineering. I did this because while I believe myself capable of succeeding in more difficult upper-graduate classes (time will tell if this is the case), I don't think this would be the case if I chose a field I had zero interest in. See, I recognized that it wouldn't simply be 4 years of pain.. but a lifetime. If I hated <Field X> in university I'd likely hate it as a career as well.

This is the dilemma you're facing now. Perhaps you could consider other fields that you find more interesting; fields that, while not being as lucrative as medicine, offer a reasonable salary after graduation. Mathematics, economics, computer science, physics, engineering (so many to choose from!), etc. There is more to success than medical and law school. Springs and planes are just elementary ways to teach physical concepts, concepts which are applied in upper level courses that teach you to design aircraft or improve fuels. You would know better than we would what you might enjoy doing in your later years.. after that it's simply a matter of putting your head down and doing what needs to be done.