Is it possible for a pion to decay into a proton and a photon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kenai
  • Start date Start date
Kenai
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,
I was wondering if this reactions is possible:

\pi^{+} + n \rightarrow p + \gamma

(Assuming there is enough energy in the initial state to make the reaction go)

If not, what law is violated?

Lepton and baryon numbers are ok... also angular momentum, so I guess it's possible, but still... I can't figure out how to draw the feynman diagram, since there is a total of 5 quarks in the initial state (u,\bar{d}... d,d,u) and there is just 3 in the final state (u,u,d and gamma).

At first, I was thinking in merging d and \bar{d} into a photon , but just 1 photon would violate the momentum conservation law...

Any ideas?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Kenai said:
I can't figure out how to draw the feynman diagram

I would attach gluon(s) to the quark lines, and have a quark radiate a photon.
 


daschaich said:
I would attach gluon(s) to the quark lines, and have a quark radiate a photon.

Ok, a gluon can be attached into d, \bar{d}

But then I would have an excited system with:

d \bar{d} \rightarrow \it{g}

Which is the problem, since I would already have the u u d configuration necessary for the proton in the final state, and the gamma can come from radiation from a quark as you said.

I'm using now the W boson to interact with one of the down quarks producing an up quark, I guest that would be possible. What do you guys think?

i57yc5.png
 


All of your hadrons are bound states, and have tons of glue floating around inside them. I'm coming from a lattice QCD perspective, where we don't even bother drawing the gluons; we just use "quark-line diagrams" (and compute the path integral nonperturbatively...).

At any rate, two quick comments:

1) Your diagram basically has pi^+ converting into a W^+. This is going to be way off mass-shell, and also introduces two weak vertexes. I suspect it is negligible.

2) Isn't this process just pion photo-production "in reverse"? There should be lots of relevant literature about gamma-p interactions. They may invoke some "hadronization" for the pion and nucleon final states, in lieu of dealing with the glue.
 


daschaich said:
1) Your diagram basically has pi^+ converting into a W^+. This is going to be way off mass-shell, and also introduces two weak vertexes. I suspect it is negligible.

I would guess that the helicity problem with that is worse than the mass shell suppression.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top