Is it possible to build a toy boat powered by high-power LEDs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TimSmall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat Light
AI Thread Summary
Building a toy boat powered by high-power LEDs is theoretically possible, as discussed in the forum. The proposed design involves using three Cree XR-E "Q5" LEDs with a total power consumption of approximately 10 watts, producing about 700 lumens. The idea is that the light emitted could create a forward force due to momentum, but calculations suggest that the resulting speed may not be practical. Efficiency concerns arise, as only about 1 watt is converted to light, with the rest lost as heat. Ultimately, the discussion leans towards the complexity of the project, with the author considering other uses for the LEDs instead.
TimSmall
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Light propelled toy boat?

Hi,

I was wondering if it would be possible to to produce an LED propelled model boat - no practical application, just a toy.

I think it would be possible to make a boat using something on the order of 3 high-power LEDs, with a small lithium based battery, with a total weight of the order of 100 grams. The LEDs can be pretty well focussed, so nearly all the light would go out in one direction, to about 10 degrees of arc. The boat would be something like 100mm long by 50mm wide. The battery wouldn't last long, but nevermind.

This is how far I got...

Total power consumption of LEDs = ~10 watts.
Light output = ~700 lumens (3x Cree XR-E "Q5" grade).

From: www dot lumitex dot com slash spec_1.html

I think you get about 1 watt out of that in light (1 lumen = 1.5* 10^-3 watts) i.e. around 10% efficiency - you'll have to dump the other 9 watts of heat into the water.

My somewhat rusty physics tells me that pushing 1 watt worth of photons out the back of the boat should result in an equal and opposite forward force on the boat? Is this the case? If so, would the force be enough to actually push the boat forward?

Assuming no friction, I tried to calculate using (ke=1/2mv^2) the velocity after once second (i.e. 1 joule of k.e), and got a speed of 4.4 meters per second, which didn't seem to make much sense to me...

What am I doing wrong?

Cheers,

Tim.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Another opportunity for a xkcd link

http://blag.xkcd.com/2008/02/15/the-laser-elevator/"

look for the squirrel
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A question of momentum...

Ahh, that makes sense.

Strangely enough, I did have the idea of mounting the LEDs at the centre of a mirror, and then mounting a fixed mirror on the side of the tank, with the vague feeling that it'd get more energy out...

Oh well, could have been worse - I could have actually gone to the trouble of building one.

I'll stick to building the LEDs into bike lights instead... diyled.org.

Tim.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top