Communicating Through an Einstein-Rosen Bridge Without Causality Violation

In summary, a possible way to communicate through an Einstein-Rosen bridge without violating causality is by using time dilation. By accelerating one end of the bridge at relativistic speeds, the signals received at the other end will be time dilated. This can be achieved by sending photons through the bridge and having a clock attached to the other end emit two photons every second. When the end with the clock accelerates away, an observer on Earth will see the signals from both direct and bridge paths slow down. This allows for communication without violating causality. Other ideas for maintaining causality using an Einstein-Rosen bridge include Kip Thorne's concept of traversable wormholes.
  • #1
superpaul3000
62
1
Is it possible to communicate through an Einstein-Rosen bridge without violating causality?

I suspect that it is possible as long as time dilation occurs during the process of moving one end of the bridge at relativistic speeds as in the following scenario:
Imagine an Einstein-Rosen bridge that can at the very least allow photons to be sent through it. These photons would traverse the bridge at the speed of light but faster than a normal light beam traversing the actual path between the two ends. When you accelerate one end any signals received at the other end will be time dilated in the same way that any direct signal from the accelerated object will be time dilated. Let’s leave end 1 on Earth and put end 2 on a very fast spaceship. Also attach end 2 to a clock that emits two photons every second. One photon travels the normal path between end 1 and end 2 while the other photon travels through the bridge. An observer on Earth sees both photons arriving at the same time. Now the end2/clock system accelerates away from Earth to near the speed of light. The observer on Earth sees the signals from the direct path slow down to one photon per year but also sees the signals from end 1 slow down to one photon per year. The observer on Earth sees the two photons at the same time at first but then as the distance between the two ends grows, the direct path photons are delayed by time dilation and the delay of actually having to traverse the distance. The end2/clock system now decelerates to zero velocity 5 light years away. Now the observer has aged 5 years while any second observer traveling with the end2/clock system on the spaceship will not have aged. If the observer at end 1 on Earth sends a message encoded in photons through the bridge to the observer at end2 telling him to turn off the clock, the observer at end1 will stop seeing the photons traveling through the bridge but he will continue seeing the clock tick when looking down the direct path. In fact after 5 years the observer on Earth will see the spaceship is only half way there since from their perspective it would take 2.5 years for a spaceship traveling near the speed of light to get halfway and then another 2.5 years for light to travel the distance back. After 10 total years the observer on Earth would see the clock stop ticking on the direct path. The reason why this does not violate causality is because if the observer at end 2 travels back to the observer at end 1, each end of the bridge will still be at the same time (10 years from the starting point) and the observer won't be able to communicate with his future or his past.
Is that scenario consistent with relativity? Are there other ideas for ways of maintaining causality given an Einstein-Rosen bridge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

1. What is an Einstein-Rosen Bridge?

An Einstein-Rosen Bridge, also known as a wormhole, is a theoretical concept in physics that suggests the existence of a shortcut through space-time, connecting two distant points. It is named after the scientists Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen who first proposed the idea in 1935.

2. How does an Einstein-Rosen Bridge allow for communication?

An Einstein-Rosen Bridge allows for communication by creating a shortcut through space-time, effectively reducing the distance between two points. This allows for information to travel through the bridge at faster-than-light speeds, making communication possible between two points that would otherwise be too far apart to send a message.

3. Can information be sent through an Einstein-Rosen Bridge without violating causality?

Theoretically, it is possible to send information through an Einstein-Rosen Bridge without violating causality. This can be achieved by carefully controlling the timing and location of the bridge's entrance and exit points. However, this is still a topic of debate and further research is needed to fully understand the implications of this type of communication.

4. Are there any current experiments or technologies using Einstein-Rosen Bridges for communication?

At this time, there are no known experiments or technologies that use Einstein-Rosen Bridges for communication. The concept is still purely theoretical and there are many challenges and limitations that need to be addressed before it can be practically applied.

5. What are the potential implications of using Einstein-Rosen Bridges for communication?

If it were possible to use Einstein-Rosen Bridges for communication, it could have significant implications for space travel and long-distance communication. It could also potentially revolutionize our understanding of the laws of physics and lead to new advancements in technology. However, there are also ethical and safety concerns that need to be carefully considered before any practical applications can be developed.

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
546
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
691
Replies
32
Views
906
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
977
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
761
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
98
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
895
Back
Top