Is it Possible to Transfer All Momentum in Billiards?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kidprince777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Billiards Physics
AI Thread Summary
In billiards, it is not possible for the cue ball to stop completely and transfer all its momentum to the object ball due to energy loss in the form of sound and heat during the collision. Understanding elastic and inelastic collisions is crucial for analyzing this scenario, as they dictate how momentum and kinetic energy are conserved. For the second question regarding Staten Island's kinetic energy, it requires defining the reference frame, whether considering it as a single object or a collection of moving objects. Calculating this energy and comparing it to an atomic bomb's energy release involves using relevant equations and reliable data sources. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the complexities of momentum transfer and energy calculations in physics.
kidprince777
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, i an new and i need help with two questions.
1) In billiards(pool), is it possible for the cue ball, when struck, to stop and transfer all the momentum to the ball it hit? If yes, why does it stop??
2) Calculate the kinetic energy of Staten Island ( a city in new york) and compare it to an atomic bomb
Please be detailed and understandable, and provide links if possible..Thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org


For 1) I would look up elastic and inelastic collisions and make sure I had a thorough understanding of them. Decide which collision describes better a billiards collision. Use conservation of momentum and maybe conservation of KE as appropriate.

For 2) Use your relevant equations and find a reliable source for your parameters and the energy released from an atomic bomb explosion.
 


The kinetic energy depends on the reference frame. You have to know(decide) in respect to what.
Do they mean Staten Island as a single object, moving around the Sun with the Earth and also spinning around the axis? Or maybe as a collection of objects moving around? This last one will be some sort of "internal energy".
 


i had to post for namesake. i would help you "but it sounds like homework" so i cant. :biggrin:
 


It wouldn't transfer all of the energy to the ball as some of the energy would be wasted; some energy would be transferred to sound/heat...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top