Is it possible to write pV=nRT as pV=mRT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter superjose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pv=nrt
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the use of the ideal gas law, specifically the equation pV = mRT, in a hydrology class. The original poster is confused about this formulation, believing it should include the molar mass, represented as pV = mRT/M. Clarification reveals that the teacher is likely using a specific gas constant (R) for a particular gas, which is a common practice in climate sciences. This alternative representation of the equation is acknowledged as valid, helping to resolve the poster's confusion.
superjose
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi people. I've been scratching my head for some time now...

My teacher of hydrology class keeps posting pV = mRT and I don't know why he is doing that.

He's trying to get the density of the air.

But I know it should go like this

pV =mRT/M...

Can someone clarify this for me?

:s

Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Probably he is using R that is specific for a given gas. Nonsense if you ask me, but I have seen it done in climate sciences.
 
jedishrfu said:
Apparently its an alternative way of writing the formula given the mass:

http://crown.panam.edu/thermodynamics/homework/javascript/gaslaw1f.htm

and here:

http://www.roymech.co.uk/Related/Thermos/Thermos_Specific_heat.html

Borek said:
Probably he is using R that is specific for a given gas. Nonsense if you ask me, but I have seen it done in climate sciences.

Thanks a lot, it has solved my doubts! :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top