Is it really possible to see down to mag 8?

  • Thread starter Thread starter logic10
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the visibility of Neptune to the naked eye, questioning whether it can be seen under ideal conditions despite its apparent magnitude of 7.78. While the Bortle Dark Sky Scale suggests visibility down to magnitude 8, sources consistently state that Neptune remains too dim for naked-eye observation. The conversation highlights the challenge of finding perfect dark sky conditions, as most locations experience some light pollution. Additionally, the relationship between angular diameter and apparent magnitude is noted, suggesting that Neptune's small angular size may contribute to its invisibility. Ultimately, most observers are unlikely to see Neptune without optical aid, despite theoretical possibilities.
logic10
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I saw this thread about Neptune's naked eye visiblity: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=362668 . I found this thread when I was searching for an answer to the very same question that is asked there.

In every source I've seen that actually details the Bortle Dark Sky scale it has been said that one can see down to Mag 8 under perfect conditions (I think I've seen some sources that have said 8.5, which makes this even more puzzling.) Neptune's magnitude is sometimes as bright as 7.78. Yet, every single source I've seen has said that Neptune is not naked-eye visible even under perfect conditions.

To be clear here, I do understand the basic issues relating to apparent magnitude and such. I am aware that Neptune is way farther from Earth than the naked eye planets, and that that is the reason why it is so dim. But... it seems like according to the Bortle Dark Sky Scale it would be just barely within naked eye range under absolutely perfect conditions. Is this true? I've had trouble finding anything that actually addresses the issue, most of the sources that say you can go down to mag 8 do not address Neptune in particular, while most sources that talk about the naked eye planets just say "Neptune is too dim."

So... is it actually possible to see Neptune with the naked eye?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I've always read that the limiting magnitude for the naked eye is 6-6.5, not 8. For example here: http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0011310 (fig 6.) or here: http://www.astrometry.org/magnitude.php

There's always some variation between individuals, so perhaps that can account for rare cases of people being able to see down to mag 8, but for the majority of observers it should be too dim.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do know that its really, really hard to find a perfect dark sky site. Most places still get some light pollution, even if only just a tad. But, it seems like according to the Bortle Dark Sky Scale it is possible to see 8.0 under absolutely perfect conditions with good eyesight. I'm not sure what the angular diameter thing is though. That might be the answer to the question. Does angular diameter have anything to do with apparent magnitude?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top