Is it Valid to Treat a Solid as a Large Molecule in Calculating Specific Heat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter A_s_a_d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecule Solid
A_s_a_d
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
In the discussion of calculating specific heat for a solid, it is assumed that the whole solid body is a molecule with N atoms and the Hamiltonian of this solid is similar to that of a molecule with N atoms, i.e.
## \mathcal{H}_1=\mathcal{V}^{*}+\sum_{j=1}^{3n} \big(\frac{\widetilde{p}_s^2}{2m}+\frac{K_s}{2} \widetilde{u_s}^2\big) ##. How this assumption of taking solid as a huge molecule is justified?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the Hamiltonian of *any* system of N particles, not just an N-atom molecule.
 
Thanks, modified the Hamiltonian in the question
.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top