Is it worth going through all of Landau-Lifshitz?

  • Thread starter Thread starter capandbells
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion evaluates the value of studying the entire Landau-Lifshitz series versus selectively choosing specific books. Participants highlight "Mechanics" as essential and praise "Classical Theory of Fields" for its electrodynamics coverage, though it is not recommended for introductory general relativity. The "Quantum Mechanics" book is noted for its outdated notation but remains a solid reference, while "Quantum Electrodynamics" is seen as more of a detailed reference than an introductory text. Concerns are raised about the quality of newer printings, with issues in typesetting making them difficult to read. Overall, the series has strong offerings, particularly in statistical physics, but readers should approach with caution regarding print quality.
capandbells
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Do you guys think it would be beneficial to take on the entire series of Landau and Lifgarbagez books, or do you think it would be better to cherry-pick books for each of the topics in the series? Which of the LL books do you think are the strongest (I mean: best selection of topics, clearest presentation, most relevant to modern theoretical physics)? The weakest? Are there any 'must reads' among them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
capandbells said:
Do you guys think it would be beneficial to take on the entire series of Landau and Lifgarbagez books, or do you think it would be better to cherry-pick books for each of the topics in the series? Which of the LL books do you think are the strongest (I mean: best selection of topics, clearest presentation, most relevant to modern theoretical physics)? The weakest? Are there any 'must reads' among them?

If you plan on buying any of the books you should know that the new owner of this imprint has done a shamefully bad job with newer printings, with much of the small print typsetting smudged and unreadable. I would be very careful with purchasing site unseen.

I have

Mechanics
Classical Theory of Fields
Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Electrodynamics

I think Mechanics is essential. CToF is very good for the electrodynamics topics it covers, but I would not suggest it for an intro to GR, and there are better advanced GR books that cover more topics. The QED book is, I think, most useful to those who need a more detailed reference on QED specifically. I wouldn't suggest it as an intro to modern QFT. The QM book is a little old-fashioned in its notation, but I don't think that should really cause any problems for modern readers, and it's still a good general QM reference.

There was also the Shorter Course of Theoretical Physics, which was a condensation of the series.
 
Last edited:
Statistical Physics 1 and 2 are awesome, so is Physical Kinetics. Yet to understand the last one, its the culmination of the last 5 books. So that's Stat 1, Fluids, Elasticity, Continuous Electro, and Stat 2. It is a beautiful treatment of plasmas using kinetic theory and a Feynman-like graph method that was developed in Stat 2. Mechanics seemed too brief for me, Classical Fields was nice using the invariant approach for E/M to derive relativity. The quantum book is good but the QED is possibly outdated but a great historical reference on deriving the Dirac equation with spinors and the theory of radiation. It seems Path integrals are the popular way in QED and QFD right now.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top