Medical Is Jackie's Scar Real? Caregiver Experiences Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter minorwork
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a comedy skit featuring Jackie Broyles, where he appears with a large lesion under his left arm, prompting questions about its realism. Participants express skepticism about the authenticity of the wound, noting that while it looks convincing, a real injury of that size would likely be painful and require medical attention. They discuss the possibility of such a wound being livable, suggesting that while it could be superficial and manageable, a more serious injury would lead to significant complications, such as a collapsed lung. The conversation highlights the effectiveness of special effects in creating realistic appearances, with references to techniques used in the industry, such as Gel-10 for creating wounds. Overall, the thread emphasizes the blend of comedy and special effects in creating believable scenarios.
minorwork
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Jackie Broyles and Dunlop do comedy skits that I find hilarious. However the skit about scars showed Jackie with a large lesion of some type under his left arm. Looked really bad. I've watched it several times and it "looks" real. Now I've watched a bunch of illusionists at work and they can be convincing. I just would like to know if it is possible that this could be real and livable. Has any seen this kind of thing in real life? I've not been in caregiver facilities having spent 31 years in the mine. And heeerrrreee's Jackie.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I've seen more involved stuff.
Hard to tell being fake and all that, but something approximating that that in real life would not be immediately life threatening.
LOL It would however, be somewhat more annoying than the impression given.
You would be surprised how badly someone can get wrecked and still live.
 
Real, no, liveable if it were real, yes.

As NoTime pointed out, a wound that large would be pretty painful, and someone with it would be moving very gingerly. Not to mention, something that size would also require a dressing to keep it clean to avoid infection.

As for liveable, the fake wound is made to look pretty superficial, like a big scrape. It would need medical treatment, but definitely liveable. If, as the storyline claimed, it had been a wound penetrating past the ribcage (no indication of that in the pictures, but that would be hard to do as a fake scar on a real person...you'd probably need to do that sort of special effect on a dummy, but I'm certainly no expert on special effects and make-up), the person would have a collapsed lung, but still could survive...in that case, he certainly wouldn't be sitting there talking and breathing normally though...he'd be transported to the ER pretty quickly.
 
OK. I accidently came on this makeup video. A realistic neck wound is constructed using a substance called Gel-10. Must be common in special effects industry. I can see now a similarity to Jackie Broyles wound.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/898154/realistic_neck_wound/

Special effects, cameras, and point-of-view equals realism.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top