Is Jefimenko's Approach to Relativity Based on Retarded Potentials Valid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marc Millis
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Jefimenko's work focuses on the relationship between electromagnetic fields and potentials, emphasizing propagation time in contrast to traditional Lorentz transformations. Critics argue that his approach may lack depth and utility, often presenting elementary concepts without significant advancements. Some participants express skepticism about the practical applications of his theories, suggesting they may not contribute meaningfully to the field. Despite having interest in his books, there remains uncertainty about the soundness and relevance of his methods. Overall, the discussion highlights a divide between those intrigued by Jefimenko's perspective and those who find it lacking in substance.
Marc Millis
I know this has been discussed here previously, but alas, I lost track. =20
Would any of you be so kind as to summarize the points / counter points=20
of Jefimenko's work?
From what little I remember, I got the impression=20
that Jefimenko is merely taking a retarded potential perspective (
propagation time considerations) to construct relativity rather than=20
starting with Lorentz transformations. I wanted to look at it further (
and have two of his books), but have not yet.
So, for those of you that=20
have looked at it, I'd appreciate a summary of the points, counter=20
points, and lingering unknowns regarding the utility and soundness of=20
the Jefimenko approach.

Thanks in advance,

Marc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I checked what I could on the web about this author.
I only found elementary electromagnetic theory presented sometimes with useless length.
Look like there is nothing to be learned.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top