Is \(\langle E \rangle \geq E_1\) Always True for a Particle in a 1D Box?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Domnu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    1d Box Particle
Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
Show that for a particle in a one-dimensional box, in an arbitrary state \psi(x,0), \langle E \rangle \ge E_1. Under what conditions does the equality maintain?

Solution
Note that any arbitrary particle in a one-dimensional box can be expanded in terms of the eigenstates

\phi_n = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin \frac{n \pi x}{a}​

Now, note that \phi_1 corresponds to the E_1 energy level. So, if the expansion contains anything excepting the E_1 energy level, then the expected energy level will be higher than E_1. Note that energy levels can only be positive integers, so 0 cannot be an energy level (the probability of a particle having an energy level of 0 is 0, because the eigenstate when n=0 is just 0... in addition, this would imply the particle had no energy, which would mean that the particle's position is infinitely uncertain... but this isn't true, since we know that the particle is constrained to be within a box). \blacksquare

Are my arguments correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your qualitative description is OK. You could make your solution more rigorous by finding a mathematical expression for <E> in terms of expansion coefficients and then use it to explicitly prove the statement.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top