I Is Light a Particle or a Wave in Different Contexts?

qnach
Messages
144
Reaction score
4
Is "a light, particle or wave" an absolute question or a relative question?
Should a light be considered as a particle or as a wave depends upon the relative size of the system?

When considering a visible light relative to a basket ball should it be considered as particle, while
a visible light relative to an atom be considered as a wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
qnach said:
Is "a light, particle or wave" an absolute question or a relative question?

Neither. It's a misguided question, which assumes that light must be one or the other.

qnach said:
Should a light be considered as a particle or as a wave depends upon the relative size of the system?

No. See above.

qnach said:
When considering a visible light relative to a basket ball should it be considered as particle, while
a visible light relative to an atom be considered as a wave?

No. See above.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
PeterDonis said:
Neither. It's a misguided question, which assumes that light must be one or the other.
Just to expand to help the OP, light, at all times, can be considered both a wave and a particle. In fact, as you will see on the linked page, matter is also both a wave and a particle. It is true, however, that it is sometimes more useful to think of light as either a particle or a wave, but that does not change the fact that it is both. It is just that in some situations, it is important to either focus on light's wave- or particle-like properties.
 
qnach said:
Is "a light, particle or wave" an absolute question or a relative question?
Should a light be considered as a particle or as a wave depends upon the relative size of the system?

When considering a visible light relative to a basket ball should it be considered as particle, while
a visible light relative to an atom be considered as a wave?

This link gives you the FAQ that we get in this forum all the time:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/physics-faq-list.855542/

You will find an entry for this question there.

Zz.
 
Isaac0427 said:
Just to expand to help the OP, light, at all times, can be considered both a wave and a particle. In fact, as you will see on the linked page, matter is also both a wave and a particle. It is true, however, that it is sometimes more useful to think of light as either a particle or a wave, but that does not change the fact that it is both. It is just that in some situations, it is important to either focus on light's wave- or particle-like properties.
Actually, that's the best way to express it. It's a quantum object. It will ACT like a wave if you measure for wave-like characteristics, and it will ACT like a particle if you measure for particle-like characteristics, but that does not make it a wave or a particle; it is distinct from both.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top